AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Garcia Raelynn

STAT10 · F72044 · MATH007 · STATS050 · MATH250 · STAT050 · MATH008 · MATH005A · MATH150 · MATH007A · MATH015 · MATH130 · STAT50 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
62.22%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you attend, do the homework, and want a ; weaker if you need error-free calc lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of homeworkTest heavyLecture mistakesExtra credit
  • Many students call her kind, patient, and and .
  • Critics say lectures include frequent mistakes and calc can be .
  • but often low-weighted; tests and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Curves, retakes, , and partial credit help, but tests dominate and .

Online and and practice.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

; calculus and some higher courses feel fast and concept-heavy.

Online STAT comments skew easier; in-person calc comments report more challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory or say skipping hurts passing.

Some online sections note non-mandatory Zoom, but as important.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About 62% would take again; praise for care and stats .

; online MATH008 reviews are more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Heavy curves, dropped quizzes, retakes, partial credit, and appear often.

Format shift

Leniency is praised in both formats; a few .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Warm, accessible, and clear for many stats students, but frequent lecture mistakes hurt confidence.

Format shift

In-person STAT praise is strong; online MATH008 and some calc reviews are critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes and while but low weight.

Format shift

Both formats describe test-heavy structures, sometimes exams at about 75%.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and help, while higher math/calc reviews more often cite fast lectures, mistakes, and self-teaching.

Main concern

lecture errors and .

What students said

“Professor Garcia is kind, patient, and very knowledgeable.”
MATH005A
“Makes mistakes often during lectures and students will have to correct her”
MATH005A
“ !!”
STAT050

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise clear lectures and leniency, while , and lecture errors.

Main concern

and modules or lectures sometimes feel cluttered or error-prone.

What students said

“The ! She is kind and considerate, and and easy to follow.”
STAT50
“she's super sweet but grades really harshly and the exams are 75% of your entire grade”
STAT050
“when she would often do problems incorrectly/write answers wrong and students would have to correct her”
MATH008

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and occasional cheat sheets softening the risk.

Weekly quizzesPractice testsCheat sheet on some testsTest heavyQuiz retakes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams similar to worksheets or notes.

Test heavyWeekly quizzesExam questions like worksheetsExtra credit on tests
“Weekly quizzes and as homework is a tiny percentage.”
MATH005A
“ .”
STAT050

Online

Online reviews report multiple tests plus a , and sometimes a one-page cheat sheet.

4 tests + finalWeekly quizzesCheat sheetPractice tests
“4 tests, 1 final. Quiz everyweek”
STAT50
“Cheat sheet=1pg for all tests and . 2 tries on short quizzes”
STAT050

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes amazing, cant recommend enough. if you're confused.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews (9 online, 36 in , and lecture quality. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Instructor

80/100

“Shes amazing, cant recommend enough. if you're confused.”

📝

78/100

“she's super sweet but grades really harshly and the exams are 75% of your entire grade”

⚠️ Lecture Mistakes

40/100

“Makes mistakes often during lectures and students will have to correct her”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • kind, patient, and very knowledgeable
  • and easy to follow
  • Makes mistakes often during lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • exams are 75% of your entire grade
  • so it's easy to pass
  • Lots of homework, but

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super helpful
  • wants everyone to succeed
  • Accessible outside class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews spanning years with rich detail and , and lecture errors.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 56

Course coverage

STAT05012 reviews
MATH005A7 reviews
MATH0086 reviews
MATH1506 reviews
STAT504 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH2502 reviews
325581 review
F720441 review
MATH0071 review
MATH007A1 review
MATH0151 review
MATH1301 review
STAT101 review
STATS0501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 2 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

13

B+ 3 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2