AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lusine Kopushyan

MATH450 · MATH136 · MATH007B · MATH120 · MATH5B · BUS14A · MATH150 · MATH125 · STAT50 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will attend, do MyMathLab work, and want a generally lenient path through lower-division math.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear step-by-step lecturesExtra credit friendlyMyMathLab homeworkMixed responsivenessCaring when engaged
  • Most students , and easy exams when she is on form.
  • A minority report disorganization, , and .
  • Online sections draw sharper complaints about non-responsiveness and paid access codes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report easy tests, , and lenient grading that reward consistency more than genius.

Easy-A praise is strongest in person; and more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is often lower-division and doable, though some courses still feel tough or .

In-person comments dominate; online students focus more on access and responsiveness than pure difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and several tags say skip class and you will not pass.

Both formats mention mandatory attendance in places, with a few optional cases.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and fair grades, tempered by loud minority horror stories.

online set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students frequently cite , and lenient scoring when engaged.

Format shift

in-person courses.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload and textbook practice depending on the course.

Format shift

Online students emphasize paid online homework access more than raw volume.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and caring help are common, offset by reports of lateness, moodiness, and weak teaching in some terms.

Format shift

Teaching praise is concentrated in person; online complaints stress non-response.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and exams, with exams still carrying meaningful weight.

Format shift

Evidence is mostly in person; online notes MyMathLab and sample exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often praised as , and grade-friendly with easy tests and , though a few call her late, moody, or mismatched on tests.

Main concern

and quality can swing by course or semester.

What students said

“she is still a great and homework!”
MATH5B
“Didnt teach. Youll have to read the book to learn each topic.”
MATH150
“There is and .”
MATH007B

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student loved her patience and , while and uncaring with daily late emails.

Main concern

Hard to reach her online and coursework may require paid access with little live support.

What students said

“ . You literally cannot get ahold of her.”
MATH136
“ and willing to help any student who doesn't understand the concepts.”
STAT50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

sample tests and can be easy, though a minority face hard or misaligned tests.

Exams from class examplesSample examsLowest exam dropOccasional notes allowedSome hard mismatched tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams range from easy and and .

Lecture-based examsExtra creditHard tests reportedWeighted final
“ and homework!”
MATH5B
“ . Idk why some say she allowed notes, never allowed any or any help at all.”
MATH150

Online

Online comments mention sample exams and tools.

Sample examsLowest exam drop
“ ! You get what you put in.”
STAT50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although Professor Kopushyan never answers her emails, she is still a great and homework!”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and responsiveness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

72/100

“ and shows every step of each example she does.”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“ if you are looking to get an easy A in calculus.”

❤️ Caring Mentorship

75/100

“Very understanding and caring.”

⚠️ Inconsistency Risk

35/100

“Always late and moody.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great and homework
  • and shows every step
  • explanes the material very throughly

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A in calculus
  • Be consistent that's all you need to ace it

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very understanding and caring
  • She cares about students grade
  • Always late and moody

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews spanning 2016-2024 with detailed comments and mostly consistent positive core themes despite some polarity.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1254 reviews
MATH1363 reviews
BUS14A2 reviews
MATH007B2 reviews
MATH1502 reviews
Show 4 more courses
STAT502 reviews
MATH1201 review
MATH4501 review
MATH5B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1