AI Rate Professor

Photography

Clover Leary

PHOT021 · PHOT30 · PHOT010 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Good if you want real photography skill and can handle technical tests; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardThorough photo projectsOrganized CanvasTechnical examsNitpicky recent online gradingSupportive in person
  • Older and many online students , and .
  • Recent online PHOT010 reviews slam nitpicky grading, AI accusations, and rude tone.
  • In-person students who work hard report learning a lot with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many earn A/A+ with projects and , but technical exams and .

Recent online reviews paint a and in-person praise.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Projects are doable with time, yet technical midterms and .

; in-person also stresses long lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

; in person is more show-up focused.

; in-person often yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but recent online backlash lowers confidence.

In-person and older online lean yes; newest online reviews lean no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Pass/no pass projects and help, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

Online 2026 reviews drive the .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

A few solid projects and ; not endless busywork but not free.

Format shift

Online 6-week note was three assignments weekly; in person is project-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and inspiring photo teaching are common, undercut by recent communication complaints.

Format shift

In-person warmth is consistent; online tone is mixed to negative in newest reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of photo projects, readings, and .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize technical tests and pass/no pass projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is seen as , and project-heavy; long lectures can drag but hard work pays off.

Main concern

Three-hour lectures plus practice can feel exhausting.

What students said

“she is so helpful and super nice.”
PHOT021
“ and organized.”
PHOT30
“her class is all lecture based and most people dont learn well from sitting listening”
3819

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

earlier students loved fun photo projects and , while 2026 reviews call her nitpicky, inconsistent, and harsh on polished writing.

Main concern

Recent students report AI accusations on clean writing and worsening grades after fixes.

What students said

“if you were a very great writer, she would basically accuse you for using ai.”
PHOT010
“Her class is fun and I never really felt stressed during the course besides during the exams.”
PHOT010
“ ! !!”
PHOT010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are technical and reading-based while .

Technical midterm and finalReading-heavy testsProject-based workExtra creditPass/no pass assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and clear criteria when mentioned.

ProjectsFew testsClear grading criteria
“There are quite a few projects but if you work hard you will have plenty of time to get them done.”
PHOT021

Online

Online midterms and finals are technical and require reading; other work includes photo projects and .

Technical examsPass/no pass assignmentsExtra credit
“ however - be aware and do the reading.”
PHOT021
“The and require you to learn a lot of information. But !”
PHOT010

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was a bit scared since I am not a photo major. But i do really enjoyed her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in projects, exams, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯

70/100

“ .”

⚠️

35/100

“She's extremely nitpicky and ANAL about everything.”

📸 Project Learning

80/100

“ .”

❤️ Supportive Help

75/100

“she is so helpful and super nice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very
  • and organized
  • all lecture based

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • accuse you for using ai
  • if you apply yourself and come to class this class should be easy

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • extremely backhanded and rude when I reached out
  • inspirational and very intelligent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews with a majority; sample is solid but polarized.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHOT0106 reviews
PHOT304 reviews
PHOT0212 reviews
38191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 5 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1