AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

James Singer

PHIL01 · PHIL1 · PHIL025 · PHIL030 · PHIL25 · PHIL003 · PHILO30 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will study and write carefully; his humor and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious lecturesClear grading criteriaGraded by few thingsTough on papersPractice quizzes mirror tests
  • Grades mostly on a few tests and and .
  • , and .
  • An A is realistic if you keep up with , and polished writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earn As when they do homework, use practice quizzes, and submit polished papers, though .

Both formats report As with effort; online students stress the six graded items while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

, but and writing still require steady work rather than zero effort.

Online Winter/short sections can feel more manageable; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

, though some say he is chill if you stay responsible.

In-person often lists mandatory attendance; online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

About 90% would take again, and most comments call him one of the and fair structure.

Strong praise in both formats; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and criteria are clear, but and polish with limited makeups.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Few graded items, but , and two papers still require consistent weekly effort.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize graded-by-few-things with ungraded practice work that still matters.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and among the best philosophy teaching they have had.

Format shift

; online still rates him highly for organization and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Most classes rest on about four tests plus one or as practice .

Format shift

Online and in-person both describe 4 tests and 2 papers as the common pattern.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise hilarious, clear lectures and say showing up plus doing homework and .

Main concern

and grammar, and a weak first draft can cost a letter grade.

What students said

“ style made the class easier as opposed to just reading a textbook.”
PHIL030
“Overall, his class is an easy A.”
PHIL025
“You HAVE to turn in polished work in this class. I turned in a and lost a letter grade because of it.”
PHIL025

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and doable with readings, homework, and a small set of tests and papers; he is responsive and .

Main concern

You must put full effort into the few graded items because there is little or .

What students said

“Pretty chill and funny. Very straightforward for an online class. 5 exams, non-cumulative. Make sure you read and do the homework.”
PHIL030
“grades were based off of 2 papers and 4 tests. .”
PHIL025
“There is a also not turned in for points but it is an exact example of what the .”
PHIL025

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are straightforward if and , but writing quality is graded carefully.

Practice quizzes mirror testsOften curved testsEssay or short-paragraph examsBlue books mentionedFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe , and strict polished essay standards; blue books are sometimes required.

Test heavyPractice quizzes like testsPolished papers requiredBlue booksEssay-style tests
“He always gives a .”
PHIL025
“This is a writing test type class. No multiple choice or T/F. All Essays.”
PHIL01

Online

Online reviews describe several non-cumulative exams plus papers, with and frequent curving.

Non-cumulative examsPractice quiz before examsCurved tests2 papers common
“5 exams, non-cumulative. Make sure you read and do the homework.”
PHIL030
“ .”
PHIL025

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly this was the whole educational career.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and paper strictness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“His teaching style made the class easier as .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“I LOVE Professor Singer!! He is hilarious.”

📝

62/100

“must turn in an almost perfect paper to score over a 90.”

🧩 Assessment Pattern

72/100

“There's a total of 2 papers and 4 tests, so you need to do well on everything if you want a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hilarious professor
  • Amazing lectures
  • connects his own life experiences to the topic
  • less of a teacher and more of a chill dude that know a lot about philosophy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall, his class is an easy A
  • do the hw. he goes over it all in class
  • You HAVE to turn in polished work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • so caring towards his students
  • straight up prof. Good guy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across many years and courses show strong consistency on humor, clear criteria, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 570
4 out of 512
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL02529 reviews
PHIL0309 reviews
PHIL015 reviews
PHIL13 reviews
PHIL252 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PHIL0031 review
PHILO301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

32

A 32

B range

12

B+ 1 · B 11

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2