AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Chantal Gariepy

NUTR011 · NUT11 · NUTR33248 · NUTR01 · NUTO11 · NUT011 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can keep up with and strict deadlines; do not expect a free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLots of homeworkClear grading criteriaExtra creditSlow feedback
  • and free materials with and many due dates.
  • Grading is often strict or delayed, and .
  • Many 2020 reviews love the course; later reviews warn about workload and communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many students earn As , and meeting strict standards; it is not a free A.

Evidence is mostly from Online reviews; In person sample is too small to change the pattern.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but volume of , and posts raises the real challenge.

Online reviewers stress textbook volume; In person comments add little on content depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and due dates as critical to pass.

Online still treats discussions and deadlines as required; In .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; passionate early fans contrast with and tone.

Online opinions are split by year; In person has one strong and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader tags, delayed returns, and picky deductions and .

Format shift

Online reviews drive this; In person also includes a .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and stacked due dates dominate the load.

Format shift

Workload complaints are almost entirely from Online sections.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, and inspiring; others call her rude, unhelpful, and .

Format shift

Online reviews show the full split; sparse In .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and a final rather than one exam-only model.

Format shift

Online comments detail quizzes and posts; In person mentions quizzes and finals too.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and a chaotic, test-heavy feel.

Main concern

Mixed quality; one review calls the class a chaotic waste of time.

What students said

“Took over the winter and got a B even though . Could have gotten an A if I tried.”
NUT011
“chaotic waste of time and energy, and by the end of the semester, you'll have no idea what you actually learned.”
NUT011

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

organized modules and free textbooks for some, but , and .

Main concern

, and uneven tone in feedback.

What students said

“ . Truly. Not only it was super informative and well put together BUT it was also fun.”
NUTR011
“Super tough and . Rarely grades anything. .”
NUTR33248
“This Proffesor is very strict! . She has very high expectations from her students.”
NUTR01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and finals; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring tools.

Chapter quizzesFinal examAssignment-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One In person review tags test-heavy load but .

Test heavy
“chaotic waste of time and energy, and by the end of the semester, you'll have no idea what you actually learned.”
NUT011

Online

Online work centers on textbook reading, chapter quizzes, discussion posts, and .

Chapter quizzesDiscussion postsFinal grading at end
“Grades are based on discussion posts, a and the final.”
NUT011
“no time to absorb material for tests/application, read 11 ch, research for activities & post online.”
NUT011

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The negative ratings show those students were expecting an easy A. This class is not a freebie.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews (23 online, 2 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

55/100

“ . Truly. Not only it was super informative and well put together BUT it was also fun.”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Huge workload.”

⚖️

32/100

“She waits until the last week of and will fail you for small things.”

👍

55/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Gariepy is very passionate about nutrition and truly wants her students to succeed.
  • LITERALLY THE !
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is not a freebie.
  • Super tough and .
  • Could have gotten an A if I tried.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • .
  • Lots of homework, but really inspiring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews span 2019-2026 with detailed comments; opinions diverge by year but the sample is solid.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

NUT01112 reviews
NUTR0117 reviews
NUT112 reviews
NUTR012 reviews
NUTO111 review
Show 1 more courses
NUTR332481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 7 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2