AI Rate Professor

Geography

Robert Gorcik

GEOG003 · GEOG001L · GEO17 · GEO001 · GEOG001 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and chase clarity yourself; many students explicitly advise another professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing onlineUnclear instructionsGroup projectsDry lecturesInconsistent communication
  • Student opinions split hard between helpful caring sections and
  • Online courses often , and tough grading
  • In-person experiences are warmer for some, but lectures can be dry and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some finish early or earn high marks with heavy effort, but , and C-range outcomes.

and confusion more than in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Content difficulty is moderate overall, but vague instructions and map or .

Online often ; some in-person classes feel easier if you read.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

62/100

Several , though a few in-person classes require it.

Online is generally flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

About half the take-again signals are positive while .

In-person recommendation is warmer; online recommendation is weak and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

40/100

Tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Strictness shows more in online reviews than in person.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and tests, while others pile group projects and labs.

Format shift

Online workload and group projects are heavier; some in-person sections are lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students split between caring fair teaching and poor communication with useless or boring lectures.

Format shift

Online teaching reputation is .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and occasional .

Format shift

Online leans project-heavy; in person more quizzes, tests, and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fair with field trips or manageable labs to boring lectures and .

Main concern

Dry lectures and uneven help .

What students said

“Professor Gorcik is a great! His lectures can get a little dry but and there.”
GEOG001
“ . Poor communication with students”
GEOG001L
“Hes extremely boring it makes it difficult to retain anything in class.”
GEOG003

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, citing unclear , and disorganization.

Main concern

Unclear online directions and .

What students said

“ so sucks. Though Grader and .”
GEOG001L
“His instructions for .”
GEOG001
“Waited almost a MONTH for and assignments.”
GEOG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and projects are not usually called brutally proctored, but study guides can be weak and .

Map quizzesModule examsGroup projectsSelf-paced modules

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lab books with limited homework.

Map quizzesTestsLab book heavy
“Theres and tests.”
GEOG003
“ and his lectures are short and clear. . Need the lab book, labs are 50% of your grade.”
GEO 17

Online

Online work emphasizes modules, projects, and but .

Self-paced modulesGroup projectsUnclear assignment instructions
“Exams and and it's ok if you don't know geography at all, you'll be ok”
GEOG001
“His instructions for .”
GEOG001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“After my experience, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, contrasting polarized online and in-person experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Uneven Teaching

48/100

“Lazy teacher. This guy is probably off wandering in the hills all-day while you are waiting to get your work done.”

👎 Online Frustration

30/100

“Waited almost a MONTH for and assignments.”

👍 Some Positive Sections

70/100

“He is a wonderful teacher and really cares about the success of his students.”

📋

35/100

“Be aware of due dates and many projects.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are a bit long and boring
  • Lectures are useless
  • Professor Gorcik is a and you actually learn something

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Though Grader and not helpful
  • This is not an easy class!
  • Average students might get a C or can't pass this class

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • His instructions for
  • he forgot to set up the course at the start of school
  • he so sucks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with and mixed grades; sample is solid enough but opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

GEOG0018 reviews
GEOG001L3 reviews
GEO 171 review
GEO0011 review
GEOG0031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1