AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jackie Meekins

MATH131 · MATH402 · MATH3 · STAT50 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will do the homework and show up; grades reward steady practice more than natural math talent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkTest-HeavyClear Grading CriteriaFast-Paced LecturesApproachable
  • but strongly prepares you for .
  • , yet skipping usually hurts because lectures add shortcuts not in the book.
  • MATH131 reviews are mostly positive while some STAT50 students report weak stats knowledge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are common when you grind homework and use review guides, but and .

Evidence is mostly in-person; the single online review also reported an A with solid preparation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is standard difficulty with a fast lecture pace that many students say requires keeping up outside class.

Online MATH3 felt content-heavy but well explained; in-person MATH131 and STAT50 range from approachable to challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

, but many tags and comments say skipping hurts and tests assume you were in class.

In-person comments dominate; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and fair tests, despite a vocal minority of STAT50 complaints.

Recommendation tone is stronger in older in-person MATH131 reviews than in some later STAT50 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and practice-aligned tests help grades, but and .

Format shift

; the online review reported an A with .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and frequent tests are mentioned across many MATH131 and STAT50 reviews.

Format shift

Both formats mention substantial content; .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, while a smaller group says he reads the book or lacks stats depth.

Format shift

Online praise focuses on thorough Zoom teaching; in-person quality is more mixed by course.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, but chapter tests and a .

Format shift

; online mentions HW and tests without full weight breakdown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

review guides, and a professor who wants you to pass, with a minority of STAT50 reviews calling lectures confusing or poorly prepared.

Main concern

Pace can feel too fast and some STAT50 students report weak subject mastery and harsh tests.

What students said

“If .”
MATH131
“Despite getting an A in the class, I can honestly say it was entirely due to self study and this professor is the .”
STAT50
“Great professor. .”
MATH131

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One Zoom MATH3 review found thorough concept teaching, fast but manageable pace, and a .

Main concern

Long twice-weekly Zoom lectures pack a lot of content and feel fast-paced.

What students said

“Prof. Meekins actually taught the material and was thorough in explaining the concepts so we were prepared for HW and tests.”
MATH3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and can feel manageable if , though some call them hard.

Practice-Guide Aligned TestsChapter TestsFinal Sometimes WaivedTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are often similar to practice tests; missing a , and a .

Practice tests mirror real testsNo makeup if you miss a testFinal may be waived with an A
“If .”
MATH131
“If you miss a . Tests where very similar to the given review guide.”
MATH131

Online

Reviews do ; student only notes preparation for HW and tests.

Tests after thorough Zoom lessons
“Prof. Meekins actually taught the material and was thorough in explaining the concepts so we were prepared for HW and tests.”
MATH3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor. Approachable & wants you to pass the class. Lots of homework and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews spanning MATH and STAT courses, balancing positive MATH131 themes with critical STAT50 notes. Credibility rating: High.

📚

32/100

“Lots of homework but .”

📝

58/100

“If .”

⚠️ Mixed STAT50 Experience

40/100

“He has absolutely no knowledge of statistics.”

👍

72/100

“ . Enjoyable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and has alternative/easier methods
  • He goes fast and uses a lot of short cuts but is always willing to answer questions
  • Would read off the book, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • and if you have an A in the class before the final.

Theme 3

📅

  • GO TO CLASS it will make your life a lot easier... do the homework
  • Even though he says your attendance is optional, you should make it to class every session.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews span 2014-2023 with detailed comments across multiple courses, though online evidence is only one review.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH13111 reviews
STAT505 reviews
MATH31 review
MATH4021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1