AI Rate Professor

Theater

Joshua Flemming

THRT002A31455 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Expect an easier theater class, but on your experience.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyParticipation MattersMixed Feedback StyleCaring or HarshMandatory AttendanceLow Difficulty
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply disagree on tone and .
  • Course difficulty is low and grades of A or B+ are reported.
  • Attendance and participation matter in this theater speech-style class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Both reviewers earned A or B+ with low difficulty ratings, suggesting strong grades are reachable.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Difficulty ratings of 1-2 and comments about .

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory with participation emphasized.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student would take him again while .

In-person only; opinions conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; the and understanding, so leniency is unclear.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

72/100

Low difficulty and no heavy-homework language suggest a lighter performance-based load.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Supportive house groups and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Speech and participation performance appear central, with .

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

teacher who comforts nervous speakers and a passive-aggressive tough grader with hurtful comments.

Main concern

Tone and reviews.

What students said

“ . Passive aggressive and isn't a creative speech giver.”
THRT002A31455
“ and if you get nervous or and comforting.”
THRT002A31455

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on speeches and participation with ; proctoring details are not mentioned.

Speech PerformanceParticipationIn-Class Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work is performance and speech based; reviews do not .

SpeechesGroup housesLive feedback
“If you want to have emotion and meaning in your message it will not be appreciated by this professor.”
THRT002A31455
“He puts you into "houses" which is just small groups that you work/bond with through the semester”
THRT002A31455

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Passive aggressive and isn't a creative speech giver.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person theater reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🎭 Split Personality Reports

50/100

“ and if you get nervous or and comforting.”

⚠️

30/100

“His comments are not helpful but more hurtful.”

👥 House Groups Help Comfort

70/100

“He puts you into "houses" which is just small groups that you work/bond with through the semester which is a great way to help you get comfortable.”

Theme 1

🗣️

  • His comments are not helpful but more hurtful.
  • he'll even give you a chance to make up for it.

Theme 2

🎭 About Class Experience

  • Passive aggressive and isn't a creative speech giver.
  • small groups that you work/bond with through the semester
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting in-person reviews years apart make overall patterns unreliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

THRT002A314552 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values