AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sui Man

MATH7B · M131 · STAT50 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Worth it for many in MATH7B if you practice and attend, but expect mixed teaching clarity and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear grading criteriaHilariousTest heavyConfusing lectures
  • strong praise in recent MATH7B vs harsh critiques in STAT50 and older courses.
  • but .
  • Approachability and clarity are inconsistent across years and courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some As appear, but and tricky and .

; online review is more positive but thin.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty averages moderate; precalc can feel manageable with .

In-person reviews span easy summer MATH7B to hard STAT50.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

reviews.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About 80% would take again baseline with many strong MATH7B yes .

Online is positive; in-person is polarized by course and year.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and second chances for some; tests are challenging and dominate the grade.

Format shift

Online emphasizes second chances; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

; frequent quizzes and multiple tests.

Format shift

Workload comments are mainly in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Blend of and older reports of confusion, skipping steps, and poor approachability.

Format shift

Recent MATH7B in person and one online review are strong; STAT50 and older reviews drag the average.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; so exam prep is critical.

Format shift

In-person STAT50 and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person, recent MATH7B reviews are glowing about clarity and care, while STAT50 and , and low approachability.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching clarity; ; some find him hard to approach.

What students said

“ , and engaging teaching style make complex concepts feel manageable.”
MATH7B
“The though is not a way I can learn from. and .”
STAT50
“His lectures are very hard to understand because he does not follow notes”
MATH7B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online MATH7B student called him fair, caring, and willing to give second chances.

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence.

What students said

“Professor Man is a fair and compassionate instructor who cares about his students' learning.”
MATH7B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; proctoring style is not clearly described.

Short tricky testsTest heavyMultiple tests and finalHomework low weight

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final; grade relies heavily on exams.

Short tricky tests5 tests and 1 finalHomework won't save grade
“ , but a bit challenging and make sure you study for the tests.”
STAT50
“ but tricky.”
M131

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (1 online, 14 in person), balancing glowing MATH7B praise against harsh STAT50 and older critiques. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ , and engaging teaching style make complex concepts feel manageable.”

⚠️ Polarized Experience

40/100

“This teacher is absolutely terrible. A very hard teacher to approach!”

📊

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • clear and
  • dorky and sweet professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but tricky
  • Lots of

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • always willing to help students who are struggling
  • looks depressed and not willing to help
  • hilarious and caring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews with and years; enough detail but inconsistent tone lowers certainty.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH7B12 reviews
STAT502 reviews
M1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1