AI Rate Professor

History

Julia Coates

HIST12 · ANTH02 · COLLEGE1 · COLL001 · COLL1H · ANTH002 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and are willing to show up and complete the busywork; skip if you need an easy, hands-off history lecture.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackCaring and inspirationalLecture heavyBusywork with leewayPolarizing on Native history
  • and caring style help many students, especially in College 1 and honors sections.
  • and reading; do the work and grades are usually solid.
  • and a few harsh reviews call lectures boring or off-script.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students say completing assignments and and , though some still land B or below.

Evidence is mostly in person; the single online review also reported an A with manageable work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and college success topics, not intellectually brutal for most.

; online was also moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and one notes she will drop you for missing classes in a row.

In-person evidence drives this; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and care, tempered by several strong avoid reviews.

Online sample is one positive; and harsh.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and feedback usually protects a high grade.

Format shift

Online and if work is done.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Busywork, reading, and lots of homework are common, often 1-2 hours per assignment with deadline leeway.

Format shift

In-person COLL courses stress volume; online also notes manageable but .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many call lectures informative and , while a minority found her unprepared, boring, or alienating.

Format shift

Online praised engagement via comments; in-person quality is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and some quizzes rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most in-person students praise informative lectures and ; a minority found lectures painful, biased, or boring with .

Main concern

and mixed lecture quality, especially in HIST12.

What students said

“She simplified complex historical events and always allowed for questions and comments.”
HIST12
“As long as you do the .”
COLL1H
“This professor has no business teaching Native American History. Every class was painful to bear through.”
HIST12

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One async COLL001 review called her solid with , and manageable work plus .

Main concern

Limited chance to know her personally in asynchronous format.

What students said

“Regardless, she was a solid professor that left comments on almost every assignment to create engagement. and .”
COLL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans quizzes, projects, and participation; reviews .

Quizzes on readingsParticipation heavyProject-based grade share

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person mentions Friday quizzes and .

Weekly quizzesObscure tribe projectLecture and participation
“Has you do a project on an obscure Nat. Am. tribe for most of your grade. and .”
HIST12

Online

Single online review focuses on assignments and .

Assignment heavyExtra credit
“ and .”
COLL001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't recall having an educator write as great of a feedback as Professor Coates.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews spanning online and , and lecture polarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

80/100

“I don't recall having an educator write as great of a feedback as Professor Coates.”

📈 Easy A If You Work

78/100

“As long as you do the . It is easy, but there was a lot of works.”

⚠️ Polarizing Lectures

35/100

“This professor has no business teaching Native American History. Every class was painful to bear through.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She simplified complex historical events and always allowed for questions and comments.
  • She isn't a bad teacher she's just boring.
  • She discussed subjects that forced you to think differently.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If and do the
  • Take her class if you want easy honor credit.
  • Work is easy and if you do it you pass.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's really nice and if you do so.
  • Professor Coates really cares for her students and helps them to be successful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span 2016-2026 with mixed grades and , but sample size is modest and opinions polarize.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST123 reviews
COLL0012 reviews
COLL1H2 reviews
COLLEGE12 reviews
ANTH0021 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTH021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1