AI Rate Professor

Library Technology

Shelley Ivary

LIB102 · LIB105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you need an easy online A and can tolerate a messy course shell and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganized course shellEasy gradesCaring but inconsistentIncorrect due datesAccessibility issues
  • Course content and assignments are simple and grades run high.
  • Students repeatedly flag wrong due dates, incomplete directions, and hard-to-find modules.
  • Personality is caring for some, but organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Nearly every reviewer earned an A or A+ and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

reading questions and light projects.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and care, while others were frustrated by disorganization and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

High grades and help, but and group scoring can look arbitrary.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Light

76/100

Simple assignments, one ongoing project, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Some students find her responsive and and course upkeep.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and group work rather than formal exams.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online LIB courses feel simple and scavenger-hunt style, but the , and uneven feedback.

Main concern

Incorrect due dates, hidden assignments, and .

What students said

“The course is riddled with incorrect due dates and misleading instructions.”
LIB105
“The and the .”
LIB105
“ .”
LIB102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize assignments and proctoring detail.

Assignment-drivenGroup projectsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online assessment is assignment and project heavy; reviews do not clearly describe proctored exams.

AssignmentsGroup projectsExtra credit
“The and the .”
LIB105
“There's one project you work on throughout the course, in if you pick a good topic.”
LIB102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course is riddled with incorrect due dates and misleading instructions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 online reviews, highlighting ease of grades versus course-shell problems. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“the professor's lack of care for general accessibility and timeliness.”

📈 Easy Grades

82/100

“The and the .”

⚠️ Course Organization

30/100

“You because they are not always displayed in the modules.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always responded to my emails
  • She was also very caring when I had to turn in .
  • Though .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Easy class but .
  • The and the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization Issues

  • The course is riddled with incorrect due dates and misleading instructions.
  • many things are either changed and
  • she gave my whole group a zero except for me, even though .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent online reviews with mixed but detailed opinions; quality split is wide so confidence is only moderate.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LIB1054 reviews
LIB1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values