AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Aurora Rosales

PSYCH24 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

With and unless you have no alternative and can verify current policies yourself.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyPolarized ReviewsMandatory AttendanceLimited Resources
  • Only four reviews exist and they split hard between glowing 2014 comments and harsh 2022-2023 complaints.
  • Recent students , and little support.
  • , and a caring style, so the current experience is unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Older students got easy As with quizzes and , but recent and a D- outcome.

All evidence is in-person; recent and older comments conflict sharply.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Recent students call the class test-heavy and hard to learn from, while .

Only in-person reviews exist and they disagree by era.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory with little flexibility noted.

and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

and recent comments strongly advise against her class.

Recommendation collapse comes entirely from in-person reviews, especially newer ones.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Recent tough-grader tags and unfair .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; newer comments dominate the harsh signal.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Older reviews mention easy quizzes and , while newer ones emphasize tests and limited .

Format shift

All comments are in-person and sparse on weekly workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Recent students say she seems overextended and unsupportive; older students found her passionate and clear.

Format shift

In-person sample is tiny and era-split, so teaching quality confidence is low.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Recent tags and comments emphasize tests and grading by few items; .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person and assessment style may have changed over time.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

recent PSYCH24 comments warn of , while and compassion.

Main concern

Recent reports of unfair treatment, limited resources, and .

What students said

“would strongly advise not taking her class with how unfair she treats her students.”
PSYCH24
“she was harassing other students for their other personal schedule information. she gave me the creeps.”
PSYCH24
“There is just easy quizzes that are based on a few chapters.”
PSYCH24

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

older classes used easy quizzes, while recent comments describe hard, high-stakes testing.

Test heavy recentlyEasy chapter quizzes historicallyExtra credit quizzes before testsLimited resources

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

recent PSYCH24 is test-heavy and restrictive, while 2014 reviews describe easy quizzes and with .

Test heavyEasy quizzesExtra credit before tests
“ in her classes.”
PSYCH24
“ .”
PSYCH24
“There is just easy quizzes that are based on a few chapters.”
PSYCH24

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“would strongly advise not taking her class with how unfair she treats her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 polarized in-person reviews with low temporal consistency. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Recent Red Flags

20/100

“would strongly advise not taking her class with how unfair she treats her students.”

🧪 Assessment Style Shift

45/100

“There is just easy quizzes that are based on a few chapters.”

📉 Support Concerns

35/100

“Aurora Rosales has 3 or 4 jobs at the same time so has no time and doesnt care about us at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Support

  • she was harassing other students for their other personal schedule information.
  • Great professor, really enjoyed taking her. , so pay attention.
  • She is compassionate and takes time to listen to her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • in her classes.
  • There is plenty of in the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Climate

  • she gave me the creeps.
  • would strongly advise not taking her class with how unfair she treats her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, half very old and half recent, with opposite tones and , so confidence is low.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH244 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values