AI Rate Professor

Kinesiology

Dyan Miller

COLL1 · COLL001 · COLL01 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Risky pick—experiences range from easy A with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingUnfair GradingGroup ProjectsLots of HomeworkLate Grading
  • Reviews split and
  • Online review is strongly negative
  • In person some say follow the ; and disrespect

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some say easy A if you follow the rubric; .

Online review is negative on fairness; in person is split between easy A and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content itself is often called not hard, but volume of , and group work adds load.

Online says class not difficult; in so many papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

All reviews that as mandatory.

and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

; strong love-hate split on fairness and personality.

; older in-person reviews are more mixed to positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

Rubrics and late work help some students, but others report .

Format shift

Online is harsh; in and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and many papers.

Format shift

and papers more than the online review.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

some find her sweet and ; others , and uncaring.

Format shift

Online experience is very negative; in person ranges from 4 to 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and group projects dominate; .

Format shift

Both formats center assignments and groups rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise sweet easy grading with rubrics; .

Main concern

Inconsistent fairness, group chaos, and possible harsh personality.

What students said

“it's NOT HARD to get an A. prof miller is rly sweet+does well with the given course material.”
COLL001
“She is really not a good professor or a good person.”
COLL1
“She offers a so you know what you need to do to pass, and accepts late work.”
COLL01

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review calls her a horrible teacher who grades late, unfairly, and .

Main concern

and apparent lack of care.

What students said

“I've never experienced such a horrible teacher ever in my life.”
COLL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe formal exams; and group projects.

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and group projects with rubrics; .

Rubric-based assignmentsGroup projects
“ . follow exactly what ”
COLL001
“She offers a so you know what you need to do to pass”
COLL01

Online

Online review does not describe exam format; .

“She waited till the end of the semester to grade and gave poor grades without an explanation.”
COLL001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews with high opinion conflict. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Polarizing Experience

35/100

“I've never experienced such a horrible teacher ever in my life.”

📋

70/100

“it's NOT HARD to get an A. prof miller is rly sweet+does well with the given course material.”

📝 Workload

35/100

“lots of hw but doable, spread it out+follow the rubric!!”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • grades unfairly
  • . follow exactly what

Theme 2

👥 About Group Work

  • everything was with groups so
  • make ur own fun
  • 2 separate projects with 2 separate groups due at the same time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from 2017-2022 with detailed but highly conflicting opinions and one strong online outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COLL0012 reviews
COLL011 review
COLL11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1