AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Lori Quinn

CHDV020 · CHDV120 · CHDV10 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

older lecture-style sections can work if you show up and do the work, but recent paper-heavy CHDV020 sections are widely disliked.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPaper-heavy workloadLecture heavyMixed teaching qualityExtra credit availableTough on recent papers
  • , and solid As; recent CHDV020 reviews slam paper load and lack of teaching.
  • Online CHDV020 feedback is especially negative about 12+ page papers and finding your own sources.
  • Would-take-again sits around 50% with polarized quality from 1 to 5.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students report As with if they do all work, but recent paper-heavy sections demand heavy writing for full credit.

Online reviews emphasize brutal papers; and get an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Average difficulty near 3.1; content is manageable but , and long lectures add challenge.

Online CHDV020 ; in-person difficulty varies by section.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; others say mandatory and skip-class-you-will-not-pass.

; in-person reports mix mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; praise for knowledge clashes with recent no-teach and paper overload complaints.

Online reviews are strongly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and clear criteria appear in positive reviews, while others call her a .

Format shift

Online students report tough grading; older in-person students often earned As with .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Repeated tags for lots of homework, so many papers, observations, and long lecture days.

Format shift

Online workload is especially paper-heavy; , and projects.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Split between inspirational knowledgeable lectures and complaints that she does not teach or is condescending.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are poor; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and projects; quizzes and tests appear in some sections.

Format shift

Recent online and some in-person CHDV020 are papers-only; and note-allowed tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person experiences split between caring, clear CHDV10/older sections and later complaints about boring slides, vague syllabus, or .

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching quality and .

What students said

“ !!”
CHDV020
“Do the work, show up to class and you'll get an A.”
CHDV10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Recent online CHDV020 reviews describe insane paper volume, self-found sources, and little teaching.

Main concern

and harsh workload.

What students said

“Insane amount of papers. Most of the resources we had to find on our own.”
CHDV020
“Papers are 12 pages MINIMUM and there is no break in-between them. Insane!”
CHDV020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many sections focus on papers and projects; some allow notes on tests and one older review mentions a .

Paper-based assessmentQuizzes in some sectionsTake-home final mentionedNotes allowed on tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections mention quizzes, observations, and tests with 1-3 pages of notes allowed; one older review cites a .

QuizzesNotes allowed on examsTake-home finalObservations and papers
“she allows students to use 1 page of ”
CHDV10
“ and requires a lot of time.”
CHDV120

Online

Online reviews describe papers and mentioned.

Papers onlyNo quizzes or tests reported
“Gives no quizzes or test only papers (pages +12) and discussions.”
CHDV020

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the work, show up to class and you'll get an A. she's super clear about what she expects, plenty of if you need it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📄 Paper Overload

28/100

“Papers are 12 pages MINIMUM and there is no break in-between them. Insane!”

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

48/100

“Does not teach at all nor really helps if stuck.”

👍 When It Works

75/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She knows what she is talking about
  • Lectures are too long and she just reads off the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you must go above and beyond in order to receive full credit
  • Do the work, show up to class and you'll get an A
  • Lots of paperwork

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Insane amount of papers
  • Quinn is not much of a professor because she doesn't teach
  • Most of the resources we had to find on our own

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews spanning 2008-2022 with detailed mixed opinions and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHDV0206 reviews
CHDV105 reviews
CHDV1204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1