AI Rate Professor

Business

Mariella Baldo

BUSN7304 · BUSI7308 · BUSN7308 · BUSN7508 · BUSN7302 · BUSN2601B · BUSN7303 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

many students say avoid unless you can teach yourself; a minority report strong support and practical skills.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized reviewsDoes not teachSelf-teach requiredGood feedback for someShort tempered reports
  • a cluster of glowing Feb 2022 praise versus many 1/5 do-not-take comments.
  • Critics say she lacks subject knowledge, arrives late, and leaves students to teach themselves.
  • Supporters praise caring feedback, practical Excel/QuickBooks work, and office-hour help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Several students passed with B/A range and called work fairly easy, but learning outcomes and .

Online review reports struggle without instruction; B/A work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty averages about 3.5; content is practical software and business skills that some find easy and others hard to navigate.

Both formats report moderate difficulty with software and accounting tasks.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; one negative review says yes.

; in-person reports mostly optional with one mandatory case.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Would-take-again is about 38% and a majority of recent comments say .

Online review does not recommend; recommend.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some students earn B/A with ; and learning is minimal.

Format shift

Limited online grading detail; and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Practice typing, software modules, group projects, and discussions create steady but not overwhelming work.

Format shift

Online workload not detailed; in-person notes practical exercises and group projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

More students describe no teaching ability, lateness, and unanswered questions than praise inspirational lectures.

Format shift

Online review is negative on instruction; in-person has both 5-star praise and 1-star teaching disaster claims.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Modules, discussions, software practice, and group projects dominate; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

Online and and projects over formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and harsh claims of no teaching ability.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching competence and professionalism across sections.

What students said

“She DOES NOT TEACH. She is wasting our time, and !”
BUSI7308
“I admire her patience and dedication with all students.”
BUSN7303

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online BUSN7308 and she could not answer accounting questions.

Main concern

Weak instruction and questionable subject expertise in online accounting.

What students said

“many of us struggled cuz she didnt give many instructions, couldn't answer questions we had.”
BUSN7308

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize modules, discussions, and .

Project and module basedGroup presentationsSoftware practice

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment centers on modules, discussions, group projects, and software practice; .

Group projectsModules and discussionsSoftware practice
“We did in groups a of business in QuickBooks.”
BUSN7508

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you're able to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Ability

32/100

“No teaching ability. Not very intelligent in Microsoft programs and business knowledge.”

⚠️

30/100

“ unless you're able to teach yourself.”

✨ Supportive Minority

80/100

“I admire her patience and dedication with all students. She is knowledgeable and experienced.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She DOES NOT TEACH
  • She was always late, and some time just dissapeared in the middle of class
  • she was helping me with the terminology and refresh my skills

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy class, but did not learned everything
  • The work was fairly easy
  • if you just want to pass and not really learn anything

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a nice person... but I didnt learn anything
  • she gets mad when we ask question

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen recent reviews with strong polarization but consistent themes on teaching ability and self-teaching.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

BUSN73023 reviews
BUSN73083 reviews
BUSN73032 reviews
BUSN73042 reviews
BUSI73081 review
Show 2 more courses
BUSN2601B1 review
BUSN75081 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values