AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Louise Corson

MATH127A · MATH8 · MATH450 · MATH9 · MATH2559 · MATH133A · MATH400 · MATH15 · MATH131 · MATH402 · MATH405 · MATH127B · MATH134 · MATH125 · STAT50 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you can handle a and will show up; avoid if lecturing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyScatterbrained but SweetFinal Weighted HeavilyGuided NotesAttendance Matters
  • lower-level courses often feel doable, while .
  • and helpful, yet also note board mistakes, limited reviews, and .
  • , and strong test performance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Lower courses can yield As with homework and study, but and As for many.

Almost all grade evidence is in person; the one online review does not discuss an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

Content ranges from easy developmental math to tougher intermediate classes that feel overwhelming without strong prior skills.

In-person reviews show course-level variance; online evidence is too thin to compare content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

26/100

Multiple reviews , and if you miss class.

; online attendance is not clearly described.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

About half find her kind and passable; others call her one of .

In-person is mixed; the lone online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some call her fair with try-credit, but tough-grader and and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

and notes are expected; summer/winter intensives feel much heavier.

Format shift

; online workload detail is missing.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and scatterbrained lectures with frequent board errors.

Format shift

In-person is mixed-average; the one online review rates teaching poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tests and especially the less.

Format shift

and MATH courses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews dominate and range from sweet/easy lower math to frustrating intermediate courses with and .

Main concern

Test and , and frequent board mistakes frustrate weaker math students.

What students said

“ and she provides study guide questions which are just like the test”
STAT50
“She pulls super hard tests, with super hard problems we didn't go over.”
MATH131
“the pass”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative, citing poor teaching clarity and redirection to tutoring instead of help.

Main concern

Very limited online evidence and it is entirely negative.

What students said

“SHES A VERY BAD PROFESSOR HARD TO UNDERSTAND AND DOES NOT HAVE GOOD TEACHING SKILLS AND SHE ALWAYS SAYS GO TO TOUTORING INSTEAD OF HELPING HER STUDENTS”
MATH402

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some classes get matching study guides, others report unreviewed hard problems.

Test heavyFinal heavily weightedStudy guides sometimes match testsNo pop quizzes oftenHard problems not always covered

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a ; study guides help some sections while others call tests harder than taught material.

Test heavyFinal can replace lowest test or dominate gradeStudy guide questionsAttendance before tests
“most of your grade is based on a handful of tests and can really break your grade if your a .”
MATH131
“if you got less than a 70% on the .”
MATH131
“she provides study guide questions which are just like the .”
STAT50

Online

The only online and no reviews.

No reviews before tests claimed
“SHE DOES NOT DO REVIEWS OR ”
MATH402

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had a F a month into the semester and really applied myself and ended up receiving an A. As a professor she is super sweet and makes the class very straight forward.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting test-weighted grading, mixed lecture clarity, and course-level variance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She's a total scatter brain but not bad though. and will help you if you ask her, especially after class.”

📊 Test Pressure

40/100

“most of your grade is based on a handful of tests and can really break your grade if your a .”

👍 Who Succeeds

54/100

“Not good at math? ! She gives structered notes that really help and is kind.”

👎 Frustrations

35/100

“She pulls super hard tests, with super hard problems we didn't go over.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she constantly does problems wrong, giggles to herself
  • She is so sweet and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is heavily weighted on the tests
  • Homework was 10%, tests were around 30 to 40%, and the
  • questions

Theme 3

📅

  • and if you don't show up
  • !
  • Just use common sense, show up with proper materials and actually do your work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

43 reviews across many years and course levels provide a large sample with recurring themes of , and uneven lecture clarity.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 516
3 out of 511
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1319 reviews
MATH4507 reviews
MATH96 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH4023 reviews
Show 12 more courses
4022 reviews
MATH82 reviews
STAT502 reviews
13591 review
MATH127A1 review
MATH127B1 review
MATH133A1 review
MATH1341 review
MATH151 review
MATH25591 review
MATH4001 review
MATH4051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2