AI Rate Professor

Natural Sciences

Tongzhou Wang

ENGR18 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and homework; live instruction quality is uneven.

Best fit · Self Taught ProYouTube homework helpWeak live lecturesPatient coding helpGroup projectsUnclear engagement
  • All reviews are online ENGR18 and .
  • Students say live class often becomes homework walkthroughs or YouTube review rather than full lectures.
  • Two of and weak Zoom presence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One A is reported, but .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings sit around medium and students describe real coding homework rather than trivial content.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

and not mandatory in two others.

Online-only sample; no in-person comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Only one of ; negatives center on lecture quality and engagement.

Recommendation evidence is entirely online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

One student alleges grade favoritism; , so fairness is contested.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and coding practice are central; not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Patient one-on-one code help is praised, but live lecturing and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and group projects dominate comments more than exams.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student praises patient code help and YouTube support; two criticize weak lectures, no face on Zoom, and poor peer relations.

Main concern

Lectures feel thin and engagement or .

What students said

“ we're on the same page about what this particular code has to give.”
ENGR18
“Does not really lecture about the material but instead takes class .”
ENGR18
“There were no office hours and he never showed his face on zoom meetings.”
ENGR18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Homework-centeredYouTube problem walkthroughsGroup projects

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments focus on homework and videos; they .

Homework-centeredYouTube problem walkthroughs
“Tells you to just watch his YouTube videos which are again just him going over the homework.”
ENGR18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Does not really lecture about the material but instead takes class .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online reviews only, , and engagement concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“his .”

💻 Coding Support

70/100

“ we're on the same page about what this particular code has to give.”

👎 Recommendation

35/100

“Does not seems like he cares all that much”

🖥️ Online Presence

30/100

“There were no office hours and he never showed his face on zoom meetings.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • brought about new changes
  • takes class

Theme 2

💻 About Help & Videos

  • Has his own youtube videos that help with some of the
  • watch his YouTube videos

Theme 3

⚠️ About Engagement

  • horrible peer relations
  • never showed his face on zoom meetings
  • Seems to grade sometimes based on how much he likes you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three online reviews from 2020-2022 with mixed detail and no in-person sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR183 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2