AI Rate Professor

Biology

B Burkemper

MICRO002 · BIO11 · MICROLAB · ANAT25 · PHYSO1 · BIO5799 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if and ; avoid if you need an engaging lecturer.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesKnows materialCurves testsBook-heavy examsClinical application
  • Students split between smart, fair professor and monotonous, hard-to-follow lecturer.
  • Tests can be difficult but ; .
  • Recent online micro review is strongly positive about hospital-relevant teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is reachable with hard notes and , but weak lecture engagement makes it uneven.

Online micro review is upbeat on clarity; and curves.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard-to-hard biology; lectures add detail but .

In-person bio feels harder; one online micro review finds lectures aligned and usable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; the online review lists attendance mandatory.

Only the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and some older fans are positive, but boredom and teaching complaints keep this from a .

Single online review is a ; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Multiple students .

Format shift

; online praises clear criteria instead.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Not endless busywork, but and taking detailed notes is required; online notes lots of homework.

Format shift

Online micro mentions lots of homework; and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Knowledgeable with occasional humor, yet frequent complaints of monotone, ambiguous answers, and cannot-teach frustration.

Format shift

Online review rates teaching highly; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades and heavy textbook reading.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams reflecting lectures more than projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Older in-person bio and lab reviews call him intelligent but often boring, with and .

Main concern

Monotone lectures leave self-motivated readers fine and everyone else lost or asleep.

What students said

“Great class to fall asleep in, he makes the class not interesting at all.”
BIO11
“On the bright side, he curved all the tests 20 pts.”
BIO11
“Easy A if you willing to study hard and .”
PHYSO1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One recent online micro student , and .

Main concern

Lots of .

What students said

“his lectures reflect the exams, the book isn't used very much. if you have any .”
MICRO002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, with limited proctoring detail in reviews.

Multiple choiceHeavy curveBook-based questionsLecture-aligned exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as difficult, long multiple choice, sometimes curved about 20 points.

80-question multiple choice20-point curvesBook reading required
“he curved all the tests 20 pts. All multiple choice like 80 Qs”
BIO11
“ that is when you realize how bad you really do.”
BIO5799

Online

Online student says lectures mirror exams and the book is barely needed if .

Lecture-aligned examsClear grading criteria
“his lectures reflect the .”
MICRO002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you willing to study hard and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews mixing one recent online micro praise with older boring-lecturer themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“This teacher can not teach! The only things he lectures about is the pictures in the chapters”

😴 Lecture Energy

40/100

“He is a very monotonous lecturer.”

📈

68/100

“On the bright side, he curved all the tests 20 pts.”

🏥 Modern Micro Praise

85/100

“great professor, smart guy. a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funny guy. Great professor, he definitely knows what he is talking about.
  • he teaches in a way that helps students make sense of what is expected of them in a hospital setting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you willing to study hard and
  • if you are good at bio

Theme 3

📚

  • you have to really read the book to do well
  • if I didn't have an Anatomy background from high school I would be lost
  • Just make sure to actively ask him questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews total with nine older sparse in-person comments and only one recent detailed online review reduce reliability.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO114 reviews
MICROLAB2 reviews
ANAT251 review
BIO57991 review
MICRO0021 review
Show 1 more courses
PHYSO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values