AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Kathryn Carpenter

PHIL25 · PHIL1 · PHIL025 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will attend, read packets, and grab the .

Best fit · Easy A HunterExtra Credit HeavyCaring MentorClear LecturesMust AttendHit-or-Miss Clarity
  • and study guides make high grades very achievable if you show up and do the packets.
  • Most students call her caring and clear, but a few find her slow, stutter-y, or a .
  • and participation helps your grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Heavy , , and multiple A+ or easy-pass stories make an A very reachable with basic effort.

Both online and ; strongest free-A claims come from older in-person PHIL1 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is described as pretty easy and , though some call it English-class-like or need lots of reading.

Online and in-person both rate difficulty mid-low; and textbooks.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and you must show up, pay attention, and participate to pass comfortably.

; most in-person reviews mark it mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and easy grading, tempered by clarity and tough-grader complaints.

In-person enthusiasm is stronger; online and last-option only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and near-impossible-to-fail comments outweigh occasional tough-grader tags.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in in-person PHIL1; .

Workload

Light

68/100

Workload is manageable with packets, free textbook options, and limited study time reported for an A+.

Format shift

One online review tags lots of homework; most in-person comments emphasize light study if you keep up.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many call lectures clear, fun, and compassionate, while a .

Format shift

; online quality is more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and heavy rather than pure exams or pure papers.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes and exams; in-person also stresses participation and handouts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often call her a gem with , and free packets or textbook paths to pass.

Main concern

and a minority still call her a tough grader despite .

What students said

“Professor is a total gem! she is amazing and so compassionate.”
PHIL25
“I have no idea how a person can fail her class. She gives insane amount of .”
PHIL1
“Shes a , but gives you that you probably won't get full credit for.”
PHIL1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online PHIL is easy and , but one student found lectures slow, English-like, and annoying despite passing.

Main concern

Delivery can feel slow or , and as a last option.

What students said

“ and really tries to help. Her class is pretty easy.”
PHIL025
“It's hard to understand her because she talks sooo slow and stutters a lot.”
PHIL25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and practice questions that closely match the test.

Study GuidesPractice Questions Similar to TestQuizzes and ExamsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report study guides and practice .

Study GuidesPractice Questions Similar to TestExtra Credit
“She gives study guide and practice questions which is .”
PHIL1
“Pay attention and read the textbook (textbook is free she saved us) and youll do fine in quizzes and exams!”
PHIL1

Online

Online reviews ; they mainly call the class easy to pass.

Easy to pass
“Her class is pretty easy. .”
PHIL025

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have no idea how a person can fail her class. She gives insane amount of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (2 online, 5 in , and mixed clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Professor is a total gem! she is amazing and so compassionate.”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“Impossible to get bad grade.”

👍 Recommendation

70/100

“ .”

⚠️ Clarity Issues

40/100

“It's hard to understand her because she talks sooo slow and stutters a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and really tries to help.
  • Lectures are interesting and she encourages you to participate.
  • She's super funny and sweet.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is pretty easy.
  • She gives insane amount of .
  • Shes a , but gives you .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • If you ask for help she will help!
  • and will give you opportunities to pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2015-2021 with mixed but detailed comments; small sample and split online quality limit certainty.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL13 reviews
PHIL253 reviews
PHIL0251 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2