AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Nicole Winter

36738PSYC · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid until more reviews appear; the single report flags , and unhelpful communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderGroup projectsLots of homeworkPoor instructionsCondescending
  • Only one review paints a strongly negative experience with .
  • Almost every assignment became a and rework.
  • Student reports mean, condescending tone and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

The only review reports a C with , and repeated paper rewrites.

Evidence comes only from the one in-person-tagged review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Student rates difficulty at the max and and research work.

All difficulty evidence is from the single available review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

The .

review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

; core complaints are mean tone, bad instructions, and broken group-project design.

Recommendation is based solely on one highly negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and forced redo after unclear instructions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework and nearly every assignment as a group project created extra rework.

Format shift

Workload claims come from the single review only.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Student describes poor instructions, condescension, and little care for student understanding.

Format shift

Teaching quality rests on one detailed negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and a research paper rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person-tagged review describes forced group projects, redo of a , and a mean tone.

Main concern

and tough grading create frustration.

What students said

“She had a , and then made us do it twice because no one understood the assignment the first time.”
36738PSYC
“She was also mean and condescending.”
36738PSYC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was also mean and condescending.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting instruction and group-work complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“No”

📝 Assignment Clarity

15/100

“She had a , and then made us do it twice because no one understood the assignment the first time.”

👥

22/100

“the professor decided .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of
  • made us do it twice because no one understood the

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She was also mean and condescending.
  • That lead to a lot of people either being lazy/copying work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review exists, so scores are highly uncertain and should be treated as provisional.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

36738PSYC1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values