AI Rate Professor

Photography

Dalila Droege

026A · CINE026A · PHOTO026A · CINE26A · CINE026B · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her for hands-on film if you want real feedback and can show up and collaborate; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring feedbackHands-on filmmakingTough graderExtra creditClear lectures
  • Most students , and hands-on projects.
  • A few call her non-responsive, inflexible, and a .
  • Summer sections feel rigorous; fall/spring and group collaboration go better.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

helps and several students report A or A+, but and refusal to budge on borderline scores mean an A still takes real project work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard filmmaking with hands-on projects; summer pacing feels rigorous and collaborative roles add challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and participation as important for the hands-on film experience.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About seven in and supportive creative feedback, despite a few harsh outliers.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

exists, but tough-grader comments and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Creative projects and summer intensity keep the load moderate to heavy, not light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

and ; a minority report unresponsiveness and inflexibility.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Creative projects, group work, and participation drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person film and photo courses mix strong praise for caring lectures and and low responsiveness.

Main concern

, and limited flexibility when filming is hard.

What students said

“ and promotes hands-on participation to the fullest”
CINE026B
“Great professor, super caring and always has !”
CINE026A
“instead got a vague description of filmmaking with and ”
PHOTO026A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on film projects and .

Project-based assessmentGroup projectsExtra creditSome test-heavy tags

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and occasional tests rather than described proctored exams.

Project-based assessmentGroup projectsExtra credit
“Film making is a collaborative process; therefore, the students”
026A
“although it was rigorous due to the amount of time we ”
CINE026A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Droege is amazing! and promotes hands-on participation to the fullest for the best learning experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 , and responsiveness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“She really cared about the students and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“10/10 reccomend you take this class with this prof.”

⚖️

48/100

“I ended with an 89.5 and she wouldn't budge at all.”

📬 Responsiveness Risk

30/100

“The . Youre on your own with this one.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 50/50 lecture & hands-on filmmaking
  • Amazing lectures and she makes herself always open to questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Summer version of this class is extremely rigorous
  • Gives that she leads you to believe will help your grade but ultimately won't

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super caring and always has
  • very flexible and calming, giving help when needed
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed in-person reviews from 2016-2021 with mixed but recurring themes; small sample and some older posts limit certainty.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CINE026A3 reviews
CINE26A2 reviews
026A1 review
CINE026B1 review
PHOTO026A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values