AI Rate Professor

Legal Administration

Thomas Chavez

PLGL141 · LEGAL142 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend every class and ; online delivery feels weaker and less engaging.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesAttendance criticalKnowledgeableExtra creditParticipation matters
  • In-person students rave about valuable lectures and a caring, knowledgeable style.
  • Attendance and note-taking are essential; but helps.
  • The single online review found lectures monotone and easy to zone out of.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Tests can be tough and reported grades include B, but and consistent work.

; the online review has no grade path detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Material is informative legal content that is not described as brain-burning, but you must work and follow dense lectures.

Both formats describe lecture-heavy content; online felt harder to stay engaged with.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; as essential.

; online listed attendance as not mandatory but still lecture-driven.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

learning value; the online experience is the main hesitation.

Strong in-person recommendations contrast with one negative online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Tough on tests but offers and will work with struggling students.

Format shift

Grading detail comes mainly from in-person LEGAL142 reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload centers on lectures, notes, and , but staying current is required.

Format shift

Similar moderate load described across formats.

Teaching experience

Excellent

82/100

and highly informative; online felt boring and disconnected.

Format shift

single online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Testing is emphasized, with attendance and participation also mattering and some .

Format shift

; online review did not detail assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person LEGAL courses are praised as informative and interesting if , and use when needed.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Mr. Chavez is a very knowledgeable professor. Information given is very valuable and credible.”
LEGAL142
“ if you want to have a decent grade. Overall- great class!”
LEGAL142
“You will learn a lot. and attend classes.”
LEGAL142

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review found lectures dense and monotone, with little interaction, and the student withdrew.

Main concern

Lecture-heavy monotone delivery with low engagement online.

What students said

“Super lecture heavy and his monotone voice makes the class super boring. No activities or interaction.”
PLGL141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as tough but manageable with , and occasional .

Tough testingExtra credit availableAttendance-linked successLecture-based notes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person testing is tough; is offered and strong lecture notes are essential.

Tough testingExtra creditAttendance required
“He is tough on his testing, but if you struggle with your grade, is always offered.”
LEGAL142
“it's not a hard class but you do have to work and ”
LEGAL142

Online

Online review .

Lecture heavy
“The outlines he provides are much better for info than his lectures.”
PLGL141

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Chavez is a very knowledgeable professor. Information given is very valuable and credible. Even though, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He is an excellent teacher, took him for 141 and 142... he is extremely informative and I really learned a lot”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ .”

📌

18/100

“ if you want to have a decent grade.”

💻 Online Engagement Gap

35/100

“Super lecture heavy and his monotone voice makes the class super boring.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are still very interesting
  • Always a
  • extremely informative and I really learned a lot

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is tough on his testing, but if you struggle with your grade, is always offered
  • it's not a hard class but you do have to work
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • monotone voice makes the class super boring
  • No activities or interaction
  • outlines he provides are much better for info than his lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across 2012-2021 with consistent in-person praise, but only one online review and limited grade data.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LEGAL1424 reviews
PLGL1411 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1