AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Wahidullah Lutfy

CIS012 · CIS76702 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-teach from the modules and textbook; and weak instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoesn't teachUnclear expectationsMisgrading riskLecture mismatchSelf-study required
  • Five of six , and unprofessional conflict in online CIS012.
  • Students say class time drifted to command prompt while Python was learned better from the free textbook.
  • One positive review praises detail and recorded sessions in a different programming intro section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A high grade is possible if , but unsaid expectations and misgrading make the path stressful and unpredictable.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content should be intro Python, but , and lecture mismatch make the course harder than the material.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and one positive review says missing lecture leaves you lost.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Only about one in six would take again; the dominant and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students report misgraded homework, unsaid requirements, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and and textbook rather than huge volume, but confusion multiplies effort.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say he does not teach the advertised Python content clearly and communicates poorly.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

; exams are not clearly described in reviews.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are online; most CIS012 students report he does not teach clearly, grades inconsistently, and resists clarification, with one positive outlier in another CIS course.

Main concern

, and lectures that .

What students said

“He doesnt teach (spent most of the first 4 of 6 wks. vaguely explaining Com. Prompt commands NOT related to PYTHON).”
CIS012
“Has unsaid expectations (eg. data validation, w hich he did not teach).”
CIS012
“If you miss a lecture, you will not understand the subject. He records the sessions in case you missed something in your notes”
CIS76702

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and lecture quality rather than proctoring; .

Homework-heavyCanvas modulesRecorded lectures (one course)Unclear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, and lecture recordings in one course, without clear proctoring details.

Homework grading issuesCanvas scheduleRecorded sessions
“everyone followed the Canvas schedule and already learned what he was going to teach through the online free textbook”
CIS012
“He records the sessions in case you missed something in your notes and provides a lot of reference material.”
CIS76702

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesnt teach (spent most of the first 4 of 6 wks. vaguely explaining Com. Prompt commands NOT related to PYTHON).”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 online , and one positive outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ no good reason, and graded someone elses assignment for mine”

👎 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“No”

⚖️

24/100

“Has unsaid expectations (eg. data validation, w hich he did not teach).”

📘

70/100

“everyone had followed the course module dates in Canvas and already learned all the chapters from the online textbook better than how he taught it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unprofessional! He misgrades peoples HW/has unsaid expectations
  • taught mostly command prompt during this summer course despite this being a python course
  • Professor Lutfy is very detailed. You can tell he is passionate about the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Led to HW situation where you get graded down no matter what
  • I took Intro to Programming using Python.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • doesnt like 2 clarify b/
  • I asked him to correct the mistake in class but was ignored/given empty promises
  • has broken english but doesn't like clarifying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent online reviews with highly consistent negative CIS012 themes and one positive outlier; small sample but detailed and aligned.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CIS0125 reviews
CIS767021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values