AI Rate Professor

English

Cynthia Martinez

ENGLISH101 · ENGL1A · ENG001A · ENLGISH01A · ENGLISH100 · ENGL001A · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGLISH28 · ENG100 · ENG1C · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless and heavy annotation work more than traditional English skills.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolitics heavySo many papersLots of readingLong lecturesMixed feedback
  • Many students say the class feels like social justice discussion more than writing instruction
  • , and
  • A and forgiving if you show effort

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

and , but drops and frustration show effort and buy-in still matter.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not advanced theory, yet long lectures, annotations, and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and required one-on-one meetings to pass.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and many reviews strongly urge students not to enroll.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

She can be forgiving with effort, but and grade updates frustrate some students.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Frequent long readings, annotations, journals, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

A few call her caring, but more report boring tangents, weak writing instruction, and disorganization.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation more than traditional tests.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

work, and political themes, with several students warning against her.

Main concern

, and disorganized submission logistics for some.

What students said

“does NOT teach actual eng or . Makes you write political papers n has a lot to do w/ Communism”
ENG001A
“Stay away if you know what is good for you.”
ENG1C
“If you do all the work easy A.”
ENGLISH28

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk is paper and annotation based rather than high-stakes closed-book exams.

So many papersAnnotationsFew or no testsParticipation meetings

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation rather than exams.

Many papersHeavy readingAnnotationsRequired meetings
“A lot of , and very few essays throughout a 16-week class.”
ENGL001A
“alot of biased politics and annotating articles.”
ENG001A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , do not take her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person , and low recommendation rate. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“Stay away if you know what is good for you.”

📰 Politics Over Writing

34/100

“not sure if I took an english course or a social justice class.”

📚

30/100

“She will give you a load of articles and and you have to annotate them”

💛 Minority Support

55/100

“ and forgiving as long as you are clearly showing interest and effort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She went off on a lot of tangents and wasted class time
  • So boring. She repeats the same thing everyday
  • for an hour she will talk and talk and talk

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There is a lot of H.W in this class so expect to be busy
  • If you do all the work easy A
  • workload is easy if you just do it but class can be long and boring

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Focus

  • Heavily focuses on current social and political things
  • does NOT teach actual eng or
  • Difficult to know where to turn hw or essays in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

12 in-person reviews with , though sample size is moderate and a few positive outliers remain.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG001A2 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1C1 review
ENGL001A1 review
Show 6 more courses
ENGL1011 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLISH281 review
ENLGISH01A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2