AI Rate Professor

English

Janet L. Mitchell-Wagner

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG4686 · ENGLISH1C · ENGLISH1A · ENGL900 · ENG1001A · ENGL1C · ENGL100 · ENG101 · ENG100 · ENG1C · 75 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want real writing growth and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy WorkloadEasy Grader If You WorkExtra Credit HeavyCaring MentorLots Of Papers
  • and many papers, but grades are lenient if you stay on top of work.
  • Students leave as stronger writers; many call her inspiring and .
  • Email response and organization can be weak; online sections felt more flexible with big .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report high As with , and large , though pure free-A claims are rare.

Online reviews stress easy 90%+ with daily work done; after heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

and writing, not abstract theory, but volume and pace make it feel hard.

and papers substantial; online condensed terms feel faster.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and ; some online terms focus more on assignment completion.

; online comments say less about seat-time and more about daily posts.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Strong take-again tone for growth, care, and payoff despite workload; a .

Online students almost uniformly recommend; noes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Easy grader tags, rewrites, full credit for prep work, and lots of dominate the grade story.

Format shift

Online comments call her an ; in-person still lenient if work is complete.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Nearly every review mentions lots of , so many papers, or tedious busywork.

Format shift

Both formats are heavy; online daily due dates feel especially relentless.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students praise passion, feedback, and writing growth, with recurring complaints about organization and slow email replies.

Format shift

Online praised as organized and kind; in-person more mixed on structure but still highly rated overall.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and projects more than high-stakes traditional finals.

Format shift

Online often ends with a ; and homework heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and discussion-driven; most students praise learning and care despite busywork complaints.

Main concern

Excessive papers and busywork plus weak organization can overwhelm students with other classes.

What students said

“she will give a lot of homework, but everything will pay off in the end when you receive an A”
ENG1C
“She gives A LOT of homework”
ENG1A
“If you guys want to learn sure welcome to come here and do 4 hours homework a day”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are organized week-by-week with , and high grades when everything is turned in.

Main concern

if you fall behind.

What students said

“it is easy to get over 90%, AS LONG AS ”
ENG1C
“There is but instead just finishing up a ”
ENG1C
“ , as long as you turn in on time”
ENGLISH1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and ; little evidence of harsh digital proctoring.

Essay HeavyTimed EssaysHomework Based PrepProject Instead Of FinalRewrites Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, timed and , and reading-based tests in older terms.

So Many PapersTimed EssaysTake-Home EssaysReading PrepResearch Paper
“you have 4 essays in this class. 2 are timed, and the other 2 are at home”
ENG1A
“the essay questions on the test (which is all the breeze”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews , and sometimes no traditional final.

No Traditional FinalWeekly ProjectsDaily AssignmentsExtra Credit
“There is but instead just finishing up a ”
ENG1C
“plenty of extra-credit opportunities”
ENG1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've had Professor Wagner multiple times for English and even though she assigns a lot of get anything lower than an A in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and , and growth themes. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Workload Reality

22/100

“She gives A LOT of homework. They are simple tasks to do but when it's piled up on you it gets frustrating”

🎯 Teaching Payoff

84/100

“This professor has changed the way I write and how I go about things on a day to day basis”

⭐ Easy A Path

78/100

“it is easy to get over 90%, AS LONG AS ”

👍 Recommendation Heat

88/100

“ ! Lots of homeworks but . !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and is willing to work with you to help you understand how to be a better writer
  • you can really tell she has a passion for teaching
  • She is such a wonderful and inspiring person

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's impossible to get anything lower than an A in this class
  • as long as you do what you're supposed to, you'll be fine

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • TONS OF TEDIOUS WORK
  • Assignments due every class
  • full workload of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

75

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and courses show consistent workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 512
3 out of 513
2 out of 56
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A20 reviews
ENG1C9 reviews
ENGLISH1A4 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENGL1C2 reviews
ENGLISH1C2 reviews
1011 review
ENG1001A1 review
ENG46861 review
ENGL9001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 11 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 2