AI Rate Professor

English

Gloria Horton

ESL136 · ESL422 · ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL059 · ESL33A · ELS33B · ESL33B · ENGBENG · 33B · ENG1B · 33A · ENGLISH1B · ESL5836 · ESL122 · ENGLISH53 · 141 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already write strongly and want a high-pressure English or ESL course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderMandatory AttendanceConfusing LecturesHeavy PapersAvoid for ESL
  • and
  • ; late work and
  • A minority praise rigor and feedback if you already write well

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and many D/F/Incomplete stories make an A rare.

Online and ; only one online review exists.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

, and high difficulty ratings mark a very hard course load.

In-person reviews dominate; the one online review also flags lots of homework and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Skip class and you will not pass is a repeated tag; three misses can mean a drop.

In-person evidence is strong; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most comments warn students to stay away.

; online sample is only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader tags, no late work, and .

Format shift

Consistent harshness across in-person and the single online review.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and constant participation create a heavy load.

Format shift

and reading; online notes lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few find her inspirational, but most describe confusion, rudeness, and little skill growth.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative; online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays, research papers, and in-class writing drive .

Format shift

and in-class essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Most in-person students call her a , and confusing or unhelpful lectures.

Main concern

Rude responses, no late work, little constructive help, and GPA risk.

What students said

“ . It is hard to contact her outside of class.”
ENG1A
“ . Gives no constructive criticism for essays and refuses to help students.”
ENGLISH1B
“She may be very knowledgable but you can't learn anything from her”
33B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

DSPS accommodations denied and disability support labeled plagiarism.

Main concern

Accessibility and fairness failures for students with learning disabilities.

What students said

“she denied my LDs and said my usage of an educational therapist was an act of plagiarism”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on timed in-class essays and .

In-class essaysHarsh essay gradingGrammar penalty policiesResearch paper

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work features in-class essays, research papers, and .

In-class writingResearch paperHarsh essay grades
“ . Requires 1 research paper before final. .”
33B
“Any kind of grammatical error on one of that paper.”
ENG1B

Online

Online review ; focus is accommodations conflict.

Homework heavyReading heavy
“ . I am registered with DSPS with several learning disabilities”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Gives no constructive criticism for essays and refuses to help students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (49 in person, 1 online), highlighting harsh grading and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

22/100

“ I have met in PCC!”

📝

18/100

“ and makes 1st year students feel incompetent.”

⏰

12/100

“ harshly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is a bad teacher. you learn nothing in her class
  • she confuses you or deliberately plays word games with students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an easy A, this isn't the class for you
  • You have to work really hard for it

Theme 3

💔 About Support & Tone

  • she is so mean
  • She refuses to answer any questions of my classmates
  • she denied my LDs and said my usage of an educational therapist was an act of plagiarism

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

141

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with consistent harsh-grading and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 514
3 out of 510
2 out of 520
1 out of 567

Course coverage

ESL33B9 reviews
ENG1A7 reviews
ENG1B6 reviews
ENGLISH1B6 reviews
ESL1365 reviews
Show 13 more courses
33B4 reviews
ELS33B2 reviews
1321 review
305721 review
33A1 review
ENGBENG1 review
ENGL0591 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGLISH531 review
ESL1221 review
ESL33A1 review
ESL4221 review
ESL58361 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4