AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kun Niu

MATH · MATH450 · MATH030 · MATH125 · MATH165 · MATH250 · STAT050 · MATH131 · MATH7B · MATH402 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
35.29%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math and can teach yourself from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyConfusing LecturesSelf-Teach RequiredLanguage Barrier
  • Many students say and force self-teaching from the book or tutors.
  • Exams are often test-heavy with low class averages and .
  • A minority of students praise her as patient and caring, but overall sentiment is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

, and frequent low class exam averages mean an A usually requires heavy self-study and .

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content can feel manageable for strong math students, but and fast coverage make the course feel hard for most.

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and skipping hurts your chance to pass.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Majority urge students not to , and poor exam outcomes.

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students repeatedly tag her as a and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common themes are unclear , and needing tutors or YouTube.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Reviews emphasize tests, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews dominate and paint a tough, test-heavy experience with , and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

, and low class averages make passing hard without strong self-study.

What students said

“ !!!!!!!”
STAT050
“TOTAL MATH NIGHTMARE. BEWARE.”
MATH450
“You are better off watching Youtube videos for an .”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and hard with few study guides, and class averages are often reported as very low.

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesNo Study GuidesHard Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report test-heavy courses, weekly quizzes, few study guides, and very low class exam averages.

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesNo Study GuidesHard Exams
“all im gonna say is that the mean exam scores were in the low 40's for the ENTIRE CLASS.”
STAT050
“Never gives any study guides for exams and there's a .”
STAT050

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you want to teach urself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 in-person , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

30/100

“She cannot teach the subject whatsoever.”

🧪

34/100

“the mean exam scores were in the low 40's for the ENTIRE CLASS.”

🚫 Recommendation

32/100

“ !!!!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cannot teach the subject whatsoever.
  • You are better off watching Youtube videos for an .
  • Doesn't know how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • mean exam scores were in the low 40's for the ENTIRE CLASS
  • I suck at math and I know it, yet I can do molar conversions in chemistry and have a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very flexible and nice.
  • Professor Niu is a very nice teacher.
  • Ms. Niu is a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

28 detailed in-person reviews across many years and courses show consistent complaints about teaching clarity and .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH1258 reviews
STAT0505 reviews
MATH1314 reviews
MATH4022 reviews
MATH7B2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
1251 review
1501 review
MATH1 review
MATH0301 review
MATH1651 review
MATH2501 review
MATH4501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1