AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kaykhosrow Daraei

CS2 · CS6 · CS002 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself CS from the book; instruction and instructions are widely criticized.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsLots of homeworkOutdated teachingCannot answer questionsPop quizzes
  • Students call him caring but consistently ineffective as an instructor
  • Homework and , and poorly aligned with lectures
  • and several Incomplete grades

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students still earned As, but and weak teaching.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content is not advanced theory so much as tedious multi-step work with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn you will not pass if .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every reviewer said they would not take him again despite occasional notes that .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

As are possible, but Incomplete outcomes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated tags and comments describe lots of , and tedious multi-step assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say he is caring yet often cannot answer questions, plans poorly, and teaches ineffectively.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and pop quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but , and weak at teaching many topics.

Main concern

, and poorly designed tests or projects.

What students said

“I do not think he's a good instructor.”
CS6
“This professor's method of teaching is very outdated and ineffective.”
CS2
“ .”
CS002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and quizzes are described as , and poorly aligned with what was taught.

Pop quizzesTests on textbook minutiaeUnclear test questions

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and textbook details, with pop quizzes also reported.

Pop quizzesTests on textbook minutiaeUnclear test questions
“ him saying it would be from the .”
CS002
“ to understand instead of solving it.”
CS002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Daraei is a nice and caring professor. However, I do not think he's a good instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“I do not think he's a good instructor.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“This professor's method of teaching is very outdated and ineffective.”

📚

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • when he doesn't know a topic, which is often, he does a terrible job
  • method of teaching is very outdated and ineffective
  • Very unsure of what he's doing in class

Theme 2

📈 About Workload And Tests

  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Management

  • Has left the classroom for long periods of time
  • he may spend an hour trying to figure out his own problem

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews from 2019-2020 show highly consistent criticism of teaching and instructions.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CS0023 reviews
CS21 review
CS61 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 3