AI Rate Professor

Art

Debbie Carlson

032A · ART036A · ART32A · 32A · ART36A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you need this specific studio course and can tolerate strict perfectionist critique, mandatory presence, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPerfectionist CritiquesMandatory AttendanceUnclear CriteriaHigh Materials Cost
  • Majority describe harsh, biased, or and metals classes.
  • Attendance and materials rules are strict and costly for students.
  • One outlier found her encouraging with useful critiques, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Students say an A , and redoes require extreme changes.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and perfectionist-driven rather than open exploratory beginner craft.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

and strict sick-note rules.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Four of and describe a stressful perfectionist classroom climate.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

, syllabus mismatch, and rare A outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and ongoing material purchases create a heavy studio load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

, and childish rules, despite one review praising critiques.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

and a few assessments rather than balanced exam weight, with test-heavy tags also present.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio art students , and expensive materials, with one positive note on critiques.

Main concern

, and materials costs make the class feel unfriendly.

What students said

“ if it was free.”
ART36A
“professor favors a few students and has a ”
ART32A
“Really encouraging, works hard to give guidance/critique, helps walk you through the process.”
ART036A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on limited high-stakes projects and some tests, with .

Project-Based GradingTest HeavyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize tough project grading and .

Project RedosTest HeavyGraded by Few Things
“Jewelry bootcamp. Shes a perfectionist but in the most annoying way possible.”
ART36A
“The one good thing is that she lets you redo the but it has to be an EXTREME .”
32A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if it was free.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, , and grading distrust. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She treats her students like children & not as adults.”

📝 Hard to Earn an A

22/100

“it's difficult to get an A and she gives lots of homework”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ if it was free.”

💰 Materials Burden

30/100

“You have to buy materials as you go & it can be difficult If you don't have the money at that time to do so.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • yells at you like a dog in this naggy, monotone voice.
  • Really encouraging, works hard to give guidance/critique
  • doesn't care about your well-being

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • as the syllabus

Theme 3

📅 About Rules & Atmosphere

  • No phones, No music, & if sick bring a doctors note.
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

and mostly aligned on negatives, but the small sample and one strong positive reduce certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

032A1 review
32A1 review
ART036A1 review
ART32A1 review
ART36A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1