AI Rate Professor

Law

Andrew Li

EDISCOVERY147 · PLGL147 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this professor if you can; and the grading harsh.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderVague instructionsRushed lecturesAvoidTech-impatient
  • Both reviews rate teaching quality at the bottom.
  • and as very hard.
  • Students say he rushes, offers little help, and reacts poorly to questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Both students call him a and no one reports an easy path to an A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say rushed lectures, vague materials, and tech demands make the course much harder than it should be.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Zero would-take-again responses and both reviews .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and one says he grades super hard with little support.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Assignments are described as poorly instructed and hard to complete, raising effective workload.

Format shift

Workload comments are from in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students call instruction vague, rushed, boring, and unhelpful when questions are asked.

Format shift

Teaching critiques are entirely in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize problematic assignments more than exams, with .

Format shift

Assessment comments .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both in-person reviews describe rushed, vague instruction, hard grading, and .

Main concern

Poor instruction quality paired with .

What students said

“His teaching style is the .”
EDISCOVERY147
“HE GRADES SUPER HARD. AVOID IF U CAN.”
PLGL147

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His teaching style is the . He rush through each lecture and not provide much assistance.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting poor teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“His teaching style is the .”

⚖️

12/100

“HE GRADES SUPER HARD. AVOID IF U CAN.”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“I am not a fan of his teaching style.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rush through each lecture and not provide much assistance
  • His instruction was vague and misleading
  • appear to get upset when students ask questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • His teaching style makes the course very difficult
  • HE GRADES SUPER HARD
  • because they lack instructions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, both negative and short, so but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EDISCOVERY1471 review
PLGL1471 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1