AI Rate Professor

Math & Statisitics

Nikolas Antoniou

MATH0009 · MATH09 · MATH3 · MATH9 · MATH0809 · MATH010 · STAT2668 · MATH131 · STATS50 · MATH227 · MATH10 · STAT50 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Only take him if and reviews and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyHarsh GraderStrong AccentLots of HomeworkPolarizing Lectures
  • and fair tests; many call lectures confusing and .
  • but often low weight; .
  • Accent and fast pace .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some easier lower courses exist, but many , and high drop rates.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Fast lectures, thick accent, and content feel tough for average students.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and punctuality with , though a few say it was not strictly enforced.

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

; negative warnings about harsh grading and .

All evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

and complaints that partial credit is denied for tiny issues.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly Pearson or around 10%.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

and reviews help some; many others say lectures are useless and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

while tests and the .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats students and those who found him unclear, harsh, and drop-heavy.

Main concern

, and lectures that often do not match test difficulty.

What students said

“He made passing the class EASY”
MATH227
“Please, !”
STAT50
“The .”
MATH131
“He's a really harsh grader and .”
STAT50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are often seen as harder or differently written than homework despite posted reviews.

Test heavyStudy guides and reviewsPartial credit inconsistentNo graphing calculator sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some praise review-aligned exams while others say tests mismatch homework and partial credit is stingy.

Test heavyReviews and practice testsHarsh grading on stepsHomework low weight
“Whole grade and final.”
STAT50
“ but I struggled to find a correlation.”
MATH131
“ and his notes are much easier to study than the book”
STAT50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please, ! I underestimated the reviews and took him and so much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 in-person math and stats reviews. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

24/100

“He's a really harsh grader and .”

📚

40/100

“you pretty much have to teach yourself using the book.”

📝 Review Sheets Help

70/100

“His study guides are great and they're the reason I received an A in this class.”

👎 Low Recommendation

33/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are frenzied/unnecessary
  • he summarizes the book in his own lectures and shows you how to do things step by step
  • His lectures were very useless, if

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • tons of homework
  • Whole grade and final
  • claims to give partial credit but always argues its not correct

Theme 3

🗣️ About Clarity

  • He has very strong accent,and
  • accent was thick, handwriting awful
  • Heavy accent but clear and funny

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two in-person reviews over many years consistently show a polarized but stable pattern of and mixed lecture clarity.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 512
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 54

Course coverage

STAT5011 reviews
MATH1319 reviews
MATH92 reviews
STAT26682 reviews
MATH00091 review
Show 7 more courses
MATH0101 review
MATH08091 review
MATH091 review
MATH101 review
MATH2271 review
MATH31 review
STATS501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1