AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Phyllis Boyajian

MATH003 · MATH125 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you already master the material and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStubborn My-Way-OnlyTough GraderRushes LecturesImpatient And RudeDrop Risk
  • Students describe her as stubborn and refuse any method that is not hers even when answers are correct.
  • Lectures rush through material while she spends long stretches on personal stories.
  • and many report dropping or failing after little help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Correct answers scored wrong unless done her way, tough tests, and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and rushed lectures leave struggling students with little support.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Every review that .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Zero would-take-again and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tough grader who rejects right answers not done her way and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and test-heavy demands.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students call her the worst teacher, impatient, rude, and more focused .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews stress tough tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students report rigid grading only her way counts, rushed lectures mixed with , and frequent drops.

Main concern

She marks correct answers wrong if the method is not hers and offers little help beyond tutoring or Khan Academy.

What students said

“Yes its right but it isn't done my way therefore its wrong.”
MATH125
“ 80 years old and is still teaching if its not done her way its wrong”
MATH003
“ if you are not passing. Rushes thru lectures.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as tough and heavy with .

Tough TestsTest HeavyIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are called tough and .

Tough TestsTest Heavy
“Horrible. Follow my rules and you'll pass”
MATH125
“ ”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 and poor teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ 80 years old and is still teaching if its not done her way its wrong”

📉 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ ”

⚖️

12/100

“Yes its right but it isn't done my way therefore its wrong.”

📚 Workload And Pace

25/100

“Rushes thru lectures. Spends too much time talking about her family & how she tutors.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always, always, ALWAYS goes off topic and starts talking about I remember when
  • Rushes thru lectures
  • Very impatient & can be very rude.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Yes its right but it isn't done my way therefore its wrong.
  • if you are not passing.
  • Lots of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character

  • Stubborn old lady who if you don't do it her way she wont even look at the rest of your answer
  • Follow my rules and you'll pass
  • Ive been doing this for longer than most of your parents age

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews from 2015-2019 show highly consistent negative themes despite a small sample and older dates.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1254 reviews
MATH0031 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1