AI Rate Professor

English

Ruoyi Wu

ENG1A · ENGL901 · ENG4756 · ENG400 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100 · ENGIB1325 · ENGLS1B · ENGL100 · ENGLISH78A · ENGL1B · ENGLI100 · ENGL400 · ENGLISH1B · ENG101 · E6826 · ENG1B · ENGLI1A · ENG1C · 71 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and will attend every class; otherwise pick a clearer English instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough Essay GraderConfusing DirectionsMandatory AttendanceGroup ProjectsPolarizing
  • and picky on style, grammar, and criteria compliance.
  • Many students find instructions unclear or inconsistent even .
  • and group work plus multiple papers drive the load.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some pass with solid work, but picky essay standards and .

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Reading quizzes and group work are manageable, but and strict standards keep content from feeling free.

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

14/100

fail warnings after a small number of absences.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again sits near 42 percent; fans praise growth while many others warn about confusion and .

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough-grader tags dominate; , or style she dislikes.

Format shift

; no online reviews were available.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Several essays, drafts, group projects, and but not always crushing load.

Format shift

; no online reviews were available.

Teaching experience

Average

47/100

Some call her helpful and growth-focused; many others cite , weak explanations, or disorganization.

Format shift

; no online reviews were available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and reading quizzes more than traditional exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews were available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English and writing-lab courses revolve around multiple essays, group work, reading quizzes, and .

Main concern

grades even for students who complete all work.

What students said

“She is a and . However, I think she prepares you well.”
ENG1A
“if she doesn't like your writing style you will not pass.”
ENGL100
“If you miss more than 4 classes she WILL fail you.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-heavy with in-class essays and easy reading quizzes rather than proctored multiple-choice finals.

In-Class EssaysReading QuizzesMultiple DraftsGroup Projects

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on essays, drafts, quizzes, and .

In-Class EssaysReading QuizzesMultiple Drafts
“ and her gives you 4-5 classes to finish a paper.”
ENG100
“Read before class for quizzes. .”
ENG1B
“group work for each reading;6 essay total(2inclass)20 EASY readin quiz”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a and . However, I think she prepares you well. My writing improved dramatically.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting essay toughness, clarity issues, and . Credibility rating: High.

📝

28/100

“I got marked down points for using words she didn't want .”

❓

40/100

“ . It's her way or no way.”

📍

14/100

“If you miss more than 4 classes she WILL fail you.”

📈 Real Writing Growth For Some

55/100

“My writing improved dramatically and its more concise now.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • has trouble communicating her ideas sometimes
  • She's a very sweet and intellegent lady.
  • she is a terrible teach. She can barley speak english let alone teach it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Makes you work for it!
  • I don't think anyone got an A.
  • Easy A! Love her!

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Groups

  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • .
  • She will make you wirte drafts several times

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

71

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years show stable , and mixed teaching clarity, supporting high confidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 514
3 out of 514
2 out of 511
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ENG1009 reviews
ENG1B8 reviews
ENGL1006 reviews
ENGLISH1006 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
Show 16 more courses
ENG4002 reviews
ENGLI1002 reviews
1001 review
54191 review
E68261 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1C1 review
ENG47561 review
ENGIB13251 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGL4001 review
ENGL9011 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
ENGLISH78A1 review
ENGLS1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1