AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Enrique Orozco

HISTORY031 · ANTHR31 · PHILO31 · HIST31CHICANO · HIST30 · HIST31729 · HIST031 · SOC31 · HIST31 · HIS30SOC31 · SOCIO31 · HIS30 · HIST3031ANTH31 · HISTORY31 · ANTHRO31 · E0128 · 124 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
63.16%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want Chicano-focused lectures and are ready to participate heavily for a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProParticipation is everythingHeavy curvesLecture rantsChicano perspectiveLow homework
  • Grades are often easy if he knows you and participates, with and .
  • eye-opening for and boring for others.
  • , but asking questions and being memorable matters more than the book.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and participation recognition make high grades common if he knows you.

In-person reviews dominate; the one .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content , but lectures can feel dense, dry, or .

Most evidence is in-person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

84/100

Many students say and often only uses sign-in sheets rarely.

; online review also listed attendance as no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but praise and run-away warnings are both common.

Recommendation ; the lone online review is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students often note large curves and that participation memory can boost .

Format shift

Leniency .

Workload

Light

82/100

; the semester is mostly lectures plus a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some find him brilliant and inspiring on Chicano topics; many others say he cannot teach and only rants.

Format shift

Polarization .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

A few exams or essay exams dominate, with packets for reading and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students split between life-changing lectures and complaints about messy, unorganized rants with and participation.

Main concern

and handwriting plus grades that depend on being recognized in class.

What students said

“ . He is very enthusiastic about teaching.”
HIST30
“His class is supremely dense and dry it's painful.”
ANTHR31
“RUUUUUN!!! .”
HIST30

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review is highly positive, praising interesting Chicano lectures and easy tests for culturally engaged students.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so confidence is very low.

What students said

“his lectures are great are interesting about the Mexican culture and the if you like and are proud of your culture”
HIST31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but and participation make outcomes more forgiving.

Heavy curveMultiple choice examsTake-home essay examsParticipation affects grade

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

plus occasional take-home writing, with clarity varying widely.

Curved multiple-choice testsTake-home essay examsParticipation bonus
“the semester consisted of 4 exams all of .”
HIST30
“ .”
HIST31

Online

One online student said tests are easy if you engage with the culture content.

Easy tests for engaged students
“ if you like and are proud of your culture”
HIST31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you sit in the front row and ask one question a day you should be ok. PARTICIPATION is KEY !!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (49 in-person, 1 online), highlighting participation, curves, and polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🗣️ Participation Gatekeeps Grades

78/100

“If you don't ask questions he gives you a hard time in class and in your writing. PARTICIPATION is KEY !!!!!!”

📉 Teaching Polarization

48/100

“He talks on and on about random stories that have nothing to do with the class.”

🅰️

80/100

“You can't fail this class.”

🔥 Inspirational for Some

85/100

“really changed my perspective on life is a brown/ Chicano the way I looked at myself”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He tries to open the minds of chicanos and tries to share his vast knowledge
  • his lectures are unscripted and unorganized
  • He goes on random personal tangents that have NOTHING to do with the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A as long as you participate and

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Don't buy the book you won't use it
  • Everybody agrees it's an awful experience but the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

124

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years provide a large, detailed, and consistently polarized picture of the class experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 519
3 out of 522
2 out of 524
1 out of 529

Course coverage

HIST3113 reviews
HIST309 reviews
SOCIO316 reviews
SOC315 reviews
HIST31CHICANO3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
HIS302 reviews
HIST0312 reviews
0311 review
ANTHR311 review
ANTHRO311 review
E01281 review
HIS30SOC311 review
HIST3031ANTH311 review
HIST317291 review
HISTORY0311 review
HISTORY311 review
PHILO311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather_Not_Say 1