AI Rate Professor

Speech

Susan Ivory

SPCH123B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Proceed with caution; recent students report and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderInconsistent feedbackLots of homeworkExperienced but polarizingMandatory attendance
  • Recent review is , and .
  • Older review praises thoroughness, field experience, and willingness to help.
  • Course feels hard with heavy work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tags and comments point to a ; the only concrete grade reported is a B.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Both reviews rate difficulty at 4 and note heavy expectations and substantial work.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as and participation is emphasized.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again data is 0% and the recent detailed review says never again, despite one old positive review.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Recent student felt marked down after prior approval and labeled her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework and tough expectations dominate the recent experience.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Older praise for thorough help conflicts with recent complaints about inconsistency and tone.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation appear to drive the course more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person SPCH123B feedback is split between a harsh recent experience and an older glowing review.

Main concern

Perceived inconsistency and .

What students said

“Yikes. She was tough. She didn't stand by things she told us during an assignment and marked us down despite having given her OK previously.”
SPCH123B
“Dr. Ivory is an amazing professor. She is thorough and fair.”
SPCH123B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; and .

Assignment-heavyObservation/paper deadlinesTough grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; students discuss assignments, papers, and observations instead.

Lots of homeworkPaper extensionsParticipation matters
“I had an observation scheduled that was cancelled last minute and had to ask for an ”
SPCH123B
“She is thorough and fair.”
SPCH123B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yikes. She was tough. She didn't stand by things she told us during an assignment and marked us down despite having given her OK previously.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews spanning 2009-2019. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️

22/100

“She didn't stand by things she told us during an assignment and marked us down despite having given her OK previously.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

22/100

“Never again.”

📚 Field Expertise

70/100

“She has a lot of experience in the field and is more than willing to help her students.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She was tough
  • Lots of homework

Theme 2

⚖️ About Fairness

  • didn't stand by things she told us
  • came across like it was my fault
  • thorough and fair

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • amazing professor
  • thorough and fair
  • more than willing to help her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews ten years apart with opposite tones make the signal noisy and low confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SPCH123B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values