AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Martin Martirossian

MATH227 · MATH9 · MATH110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Older lower-level math reviews are glowing, but the recent stats-style complaint is severe, so verify current teaching fit before enrolling.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring professorHelpful lecturesPolarizing supportWants real understandingAttendance matters
  • Three , and great for students who struggle with math.
  • One recent MATH227 review is extremely negative about questions, office hours, and support.
  • ; difficulty ranges from easy to hard depending on the course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Some courses feel easy and supportive, but the harsh review and mixed difficulty mean an A still takes real work.

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Multiple reviews rate low difficulty and , though MATH227 was rated very hard.

Course and mixed by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory and one tag warns skipping kills your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most students recommend him as caring and helpful, but the .

Recommendation split is entirely in-person across different years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Reported grades include A and B+ with .

Format shift

Grade comments are only from in-person courses.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; difficulty swings more with course level than endless assignments.

Format shift

Workload detail is thin and all in-person.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority call him caring and helpful, but one student says he got mad at questions and office-hour help failed.

Format shift

Teaching quality .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove exam-versus-homework weight beyond lecture-focused math classes.

Format shift

Assessment method is not clearly specified in the in-person set.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

one harsh 2019 outlier about refusing questions.

Main concern

Inconsistent support quality across terms, especially when students ask questions.

What students said

“He will go to great lengths to help students understand - not memorize - math.”
MATH9
“He really and truly cares for his students.”
1684
“GETS MAD WHEN YOU ASK QUESTIONS.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will go to great lengths to help students understand - not memorize - math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person math reviews, balancing older praise with one harsh 2019 complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Fantastic teacher. Though his class is not necessarily the most exciting one in the world, he genuinely wants students to learn.”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“He really and truly cares for his students.”

⚠️ Support Failure

15/100

“I EVEN WENT TO HIS OFFICE HOURS TO ASK FOR HELP AND HE BASICALLY ASKED ME WHAT I WANTED FROM HIM.”

👍 Recommendation

70/100

“ other students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I will miss his lectures very much
  • he genuinely wants students to learn
  • Take his class if you struggle with math

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • A
  • difficulty rating swings from 1 to 5 across courses

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • such a caring professor
  • GETS MAD WHEN YOU ASK QUESTIONS
  • HE'S THE

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Four in-person reviews with mixed eras and one extreme outlier .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

16841 review
MATH1101 review
MATH2271 review
MATH91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values