AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Sonia Parada

DT008A · ENGR10 · ENGR010 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if , and a supportive instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGroup-Project HeavyDown-to-EarthClear GradingExtremely HelpfulEngineering Mentor
  • All three reviewers call her brilliant, chill, and .
  • and teamwork with .
  • and real work is required, but grades of A are common.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

All reported As, but students stress you must complete group work and stay engaged.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though projects add real work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every review is a full 5 with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and ; three of three reported As.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Group projects and lecture-heavy setup mean steady collaboration time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Consistently described as , and helpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Group projects and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person engineering students praise her clarity, care, and .

Main concern

Group-work load is real; you must actually contribute.

What students said

“Class is group work heavy. Expect to actually do work”
ENGR010
“by far the most down-to-earth and chill professor I've ever taken”
ENGR10
“Brilliant, intelligent, hard working, insightful and extremely helpful”
DT008A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize group projects and .

Group ProjectsClear Grading Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture work; exams are not clearly detailed.

Group ProjectsClear Grading Criteria
“Class is group work heavy. Expect to actually do work”
ENGR010
“ and emphasizes teamwork”
ENGR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Brilliant, intelligent, hard working, insightful and extremely helpful. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting mentorship and group work. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“She is to the point and knows her stuff”

👍 Recommendation

96/100

“ ”

🤝 Group Learning

80/100

“ and emphasizes teamwork”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • down-to-earth and chill professor
  • Always reviews material and goes back if there are questions
  • knows her stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Expect to actually do work
  • A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • extremely helpful
  • shares her experiences and helps her students
  • Caring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 highly positive in-person reviews from 2017-2019; consistent but too few for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DT008A1 review
ENGR0101 review
ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values