AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Jacqueline Grace

NUTR011 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the only review is strongly negative and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedCondescendingBoring lecturesNo study guidesWorst at PCC
  • Single review calls her the worst professor at PCC with quality 1 and difficulty 5.
  • Lectures are slide-read and boring; no study guides or .
  • Described as unorganized, blames students, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Difficulty rated 5 with no grade help, no study guides, and a .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Student rated difficulty 5 and as very hard.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and called her the .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

No grade given, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload and unprepared exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

, and no review materials before exams.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Exams are central and given without study guides or review quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person NUTR011 review paints her as , and the .

Main concern

No study guides or review quizzes and blaming students instead of helping.

What students said

“Terrible professor! and blames her students, and she does not give study guides or .”
NUTR011

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams without study guides or review quizzes; .

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes before tests.

No study guidesNo review quizzesIn-person exams
“she does not give study guides or ”
NUTR011

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Her lectures are straight from the slides and boring. She is condescending to students instead of helpful.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“No”

📚

15/100

“she does not give study guides or ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are straight from the slides and boring
  • She is condescending to students instead of helpful
  • and blames her students

Theme 2

📉 About Quality & Fit

  • Terrible professor!
  • Really disappointed in the quality of this professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old 2018 review with no grade data; too thin for strong conclusions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR0111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values