AI Rate Professor

Design

Brett Jackson

ART74363 · ART080 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Avoid unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMood-dependent teachingGroup project heavyLittle practical learningEnergetic but unevenDesign class filler work
  • Two of three reviews strongly reject the class as a waste with harsh mood swings.
  • One student found him energetic and .
  • Group videos and projects dominate; design skills feel under-taught.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Content difficulty is low and one student earned A+, but value and fairness of learning are inconsistent.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

; the main issue is relevance, not intellectual challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation-focused group work requires presence.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Two of and call the class a waste despite one strong fan.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One A+ reported; teaching quality.

Format shift

In-person only; sparse grade detail.

Workload

Light

68/100

Group projects and filler assignments feel light but pointless rather than crushing.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Majority describe no real learning and unprofessional mood swings; minority call him energetic and inspiring.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Group projects, videos, and participation drive the course more than exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

energetic group-project classes that often feel pointless or unprofessional to students.

Main concern

Mood-based snapping, weak skill teaching, and filler group work.

What students said

“I didn't learn anything in class. This professor is horrible and depending on his mood he may snap at you or be completely friendly.”
ART080
“Super energetic and eclectic guy. Teaches fast but doesn't mind repeating things.”
ART080
“The class was a waste of time. All we made was stupid group videos.”
ART74363

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on projects and participation rather than formal exams.

Group projectsParticipation focusedNo clear exam format described

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on group projects and class participation with .

GROUP PROJECTSParticipation matters
“all the .”
ART080
“All we made was stupid group videos.”
ART74363

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I didn't learn anything in class. This professor is horrible and depending on his mood he may snap at you or be completely friendly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization on teaching and group projects. Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Teaching Quality

30/100

“I didn't learn anything in class. This professor is horrible and depending on his mood he may snap at you or be completely friendly.”

⚡ Energetic Style

70/100

“Super energetic and eclectic guy. Teaches fast but doesn't mind repeating things.”

🎬

25/100

“The class was a waste of time. All we made was stupid group videos.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • depending on his mood he may snap at you or be completely friendly.
  • Super energetic and eclectic guy.
  • Hes a jerk half the time to specific students.

Theme 2

📦

  • all the .
  • many projects and
  • We didnt learn anything besides common knowledge of a video game

Theme 3

❤️ Polar Student Reactions

  • I still left feeling like I learned a lot.
  • Waste of my time.
  • This professor is horrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews with highly polarized opinions and limited course detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART0802 reviews
ART743631 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2