AI Rate Professor

Film

James Desmarais

CIN7A · CIN007A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

, and unhelpful even when the material is not hard.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely strictInsults studentsUnhelpfulMandatory attendancePoor lectures
  • Harsh classroom control with public insults over seating, lateness, or questions
  • and offer little help when students reach out
  • Coursework itself can be easy if you obey every rule, but the environment is hostile

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

42/100

Content difficulty is low and one student earned an A by perfect compliance, but fear and strictness raise the real cost of an A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Reported difficulty ratings are low; the challenge is behavior rules more than film concepts.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and lateness or wrong seating triggers public anger.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Two of and ; one survived only by perfect compliance.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Strict about everything with insults for minor rule breaks; students feel unsafe making mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Coursework itself seems light if you show up on time, do work, and ask only approved questions.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Lectures feel book-read, unhelpful when contacted, and frequently disruptive when angry.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus more on classroom rules than assessment mix; standard film class work is implied.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All three in-person reviews describe an extremely strict, easily angered instructor who insults students and rarely helps.

Main concern

Hostile classroom climate and zero tolerance for minor mistakes.

What students said

“ , if you don't sit where he wants you to sit, he will insult you and call you names”
CIN007A
“Extremely strict in all regards, not helpful to students that reach out to him. Lectures as if .”
CIN7A
“I often times felt on edge that someone would say something stupid or show up to class late, and the professor would get mad and disruptive.”
CIN007A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Limited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , if you don't sit where he wants you to sit, he will insult you and call you names until you learn what he wants from you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting strict climate and poor teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Lectures as if . Overall very poor experience.”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

15/100

“Has no issue insulting students directly to their face”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures as if
  • Incredibly unhelpful if you reach out to him about any issues
  • Mostly just contributed to his lecture

Theme 2

⚠️ About Strictness

  • Seriously strict about everything
  • if you don't sit where he wants you to sit, he will insult you
  • the professor would get mad and disruptive

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • I didn't have any issues with him because I always showed up on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Only three 2018 in-person reviews, but they are detailed and highly consistent on strictness and poor climate.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIN007A2 reviews
CIN7A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2