AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Stacy Fambro

PSYC21 · PSY021 · PSYCH001 · PSY001 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Avoid if you need structured teaching; only consider if you want an easy grade and do not mind learning on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedPoor feedbackStory-heavy lecturesEasy grades for someAvoid if you want structure
  • Majority call the class unstructured with weak instruction and professionalism.
  • Grades can still be high despite poor teaching.
  • One positive outlier loved her hilarious story-based lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Three of four reported A or B grades and low difficulty despite weak instruction.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students describe the content as low-demand and unstructured rather than intellectually hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and mandatory in another, with participation sometimes stressed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Three of and call the class useless or unprofessional.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

High reported grades and low difficulty suggest lenient outcomes despite teaching complaints.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Comments focus on little structure and no required .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most reviews slam disorganization, mumbling, and off-topic personal stories; one outlier loved her.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews say ; participation is mentioned but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and focus on personal stories; one student found the stories engaging.

Main concern

Lack of teaching, late syllabus, and .

What students said

“Lack of teaching and structure!! You're on your own... Very Poor feed back, mumbles and is not prepared to teach!!!”
PSY021
“lacks quality of instruction & professionalism. no syllabus until some complained to department.”
PSYC21
“Easily one of .”
PSYCH001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; grades appear easy but proctoring and .

Little exam detail in reviews

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Exam format not clearly described
“A .”
PSY001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lack of teaching and structure!! You're on your own... Very Poor feed back, mumbles and is not prepared to teach!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting disorganization versus one enthusiastic outlier. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“lacks quality of instruction & professionalism.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“If you actually care about this class, find another prof.”

📈 Easy Grades

82/100

“A .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lack of teaching and structure!! You're on your own
  • Time was spent discussing news and her personal stories
  • Prof fambro has a ton of amazing and hilarious stories

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A
  • PROS- no book
  • making learning the material easy

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • no syllabus until some complained to department
  • mumbles and is not prepared to teach
  • always about sex

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, all in-person from early 2018, with one strong positive outlier against three harsh negatives.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSY0011 review
PSY0211 review
PSYC211 review
PSYCH0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values