AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Arineh Arzoumanian

ENGR15A · ENGR002 · ENGR317 · ENGR2 · ENGR10 · ENGR18 · ENG0317 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if and collaborate; expect uneven lecture clarity.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHands-on CAD projectsGroup collaborationCaring when you trySelf-study heavy lecturesClear project grading
  • , and MATLAB work
  • Helpful and caring if you show effort, but lectures can be thin or unclear
  • Most earn A with homework and projects; a minority report tough or

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many reported A grades from timely homework and projects, but tough or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, yet coding or design without prior experience and sparse lectures raise the challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory and missing announcements can affect grades.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her for real engineering skills despite mixed clarity and a few strongly negative experiences.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Often grades projects generously and clearly, but some call her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and occasional midterms or quizzes; class time often used for collaborative work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Knowledgeable and or thin lectures for some students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Projects and ; , and a few quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

tools, homework, and some quizzes or finals; many praise skills gained, some cite unclear lectures and hard grading.

Main concern

and last-minute rule changes can hurt if .

What students said

“ .”
ENGR18
“If you want .”
ENGR2
“ ; she never gives the correct answers to the students.”
ENGR002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by course from ; reviews do not prove online proctoring.

Project-based finalsMATLAB projectsMidterm and finalFew quizzesGroup projects

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; others use midterms, finals, and a few quizzes with mixed toughness.

No tests just projectsMidterm and final3 quizzesGroup projectsPortfolio project
“ .”
ENGR18
“ and like 3 quizzes the whole semester.”
ENGR15A
“TEST HEAVY”
ENGR002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Arineh was probably the . The homeworks were challenging but fun and helped us learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 , and mixed grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is such a great teacher and SUPER knowledgeable as an engineer.”

🛠️ Project Learning

80/100

“If you want .”

📚

45/100

“as a student it is very important to learn how to self-study in her class; ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“TAKE HER CLASS!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she try to keep the class simple
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades on the easier side
  • to perfect scores

Theme 3

🛠️

  • ability to model in autocad and solidworks
  • The class structure is really group oriented

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

18 in-person reviews across several engineering courses show recurring project-strength themes but mixed teaching clarity and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGR0027 reviews
ENGR183 reviews
ENGR23 reviews
ENGR15A2 reviews
ENG03171 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGR101 review
ENGR3171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 2 · A 10

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2