AI Rate Professor

English

Albert Neal

ENG1A · ENG001A · ENGL1A · ENG902 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and handle uneven organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of PapersUnorganizedMood SwingsCool When Engaged
  • some love his cool vibe and and unorganized.
  • Heavy essay load and .
  • and participation is pushed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Tough grader tags, long 5-7 page essays, strict format rules, and a D- grade signal that As require heavy writing effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Lots of , and high difficulty ratings make the course demanding for composition students.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and students are urged to participate as much as possible.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

favorites praise humor and help while .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and harsh outcomes for those who miss his format.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some call lectures amazing and helpful; others report worksheets, vague examples, and disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course centers on long essays and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English students report , and mixed personality: cool and helpful for some, rude and .

Main concern

, and reports of unprofessional behavior.

What students said

“ ! He's a and doesn't even follow pccs school rules for how to teach.”
ENGL1A
“The , and that's like just annoying to do.”
ENG001A
“His work does require his format and if not followed will be hard to pass, but .”
3639

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and , so .

Essay-HeavyFormat StrictLittle Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment is paper-driven with strict format rules.

Essay AssignmentsStrict Format
“The , and that's like just annoying to do. 5-7 pages EZPZ, right?”
ENG001A
“When he gives feedback, it's more on nitpicking at structure than the actual content.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He's a and doesn't even follow pccs school rules for how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, , and split personality views. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

28/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK, SO MANY PAPERS”

⚖️

28/100

“He's a ”

👍 Supporters Exist

70/100

“Professor Neal is one of ! !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • His lectures are through worksheets and sometimes he gives very vague and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • His work does require his format and if not followed will be hard to pass.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • I dislike this person asking for money everyday.
  • he has mood swings.
  • He didn't have much of an organization when it came to holding his classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five mixed in-person reviews from 2014-2017 offer usable detail but limited sample size and conflicting tone lower confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

36391 review
ENG001A1 review
ENG1A1 review
ENG9021 review
ENGL1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1