AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sharyn Ly

MATH · MATH131 · MATH125 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Only consider if you need MATH125 and can verify current teaching style; older reviews are very negative.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed ReviewsStep-by-Step When ClearStudents Left LostAccent but OrganizedAttendance Mandatory
  • one strong praise for and care, two older reviews call teaching weak and confusing.
  • One student earned an A and strongly recommends; older comments urge avoidance.
  • review; exam policy is barely described.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One reported A with solid organization and , but other reviews never claim easy grades and focus on confusion.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range; positive while negatives say examples still leave students lost.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

The detailed MATH125 review marks attendance mandatory; other reviews do not contradict that.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One enthusiastic recommend contrasts with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear grading criteria and an A appear once, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and review; no flood of workload complaints appears.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Praise for organization and care is outweighed by claims of and lost classes.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention homework and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person MATH and strong recommend to claims that lessons leave the whole class lost.

Main concern

Older and help is weak.

What students said

“She writes down every step of how to solve the problem in easy way.”
MATH125
“ ...her teaching abilities suck!”
MATH131
“if you look around the class, all students look extremely lost.”
MATH131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and timely paper return but .

In-Person TestsHomework and Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention tests and graded papers returned on time without describing proctoring software or open-book rules.

In-Person TestsHomework and Tests
“ and and never late.”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ...her teaching abilities suck!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting split teaching quality and sparse grade detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Clarity Split

36/100

“She writes down every step of how to solve the problem in easy way.”

⚠️ Confusion Risk

25/100

“if you look around the class, all students look extremely lost.”

👍

90/100

“I like her really and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very organize and on time.
  • She writes down every step of how to solve the problem in easy way.
  • She doesn't know how to help students understand concepts @ all!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3
  • Yes

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Also not an understanding person.
  • Ofcourse she has accents, but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2005-2017 with thin detail and conflicting tone reduce reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1 review
MATH1251 review
MATH1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values