AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cindy Dominguez

MATH250 · MA450 · MATH131 · STATS50 · MATH125 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you will do the and attend every class; skip if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkExtra credit boostsAttendance criticalPolarizing supportExam-focused practice
  • Many students say she preps well for tests and offers that can make an A reachable.
  • and .
  • A vocal minority report rudeness, weak help, and , so experiences split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Multiple students report Easy A with and curves, but and mid-range grades.

Both online and ; harsh-grader claims are in-person only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is manageable with practice, yet summer pace and .

; in-person difficulty ratings vary from 1 to 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and you will not pass if .

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

About three-quarters would take again and , but .

Online review is highly positive; in-person opinions are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and , yet tough-grader tags and low grades also appear.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is stronger in positive reviews across both formats.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and summer daily due dates are repeated across reviews.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and fantastic, while others say she is rude, unhelpful, and shows favoritism.

Format shift

Online sample is glowing; in-person reviews are polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

and and participation also counting.

Format shift

Assessment mix is described mainly in tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between easy-A praise with curves and versus complaints of rudeness, no help, and .

Main concern

Some students report rude interactions and weak help when stuck.

What students said

“Lots of . Easy A++!”
MATH131
“This teacher has a rude characteristic. ”
MATH250

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online summer student found her amazing with , and strict attendance expectations.

Main concern

and you will not pass without showing up.

What students said

“The . It was due everyday, but that forced students to actually .”
MATH131

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and points and fair but sometimes unpredictable tests.

Pop quizzesIn-class examsExtra credit on tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention pop quizzes, exams, and .

Pop quizzesExamsExtra credit on tests
“Gives a lot of , and exams.”
MATH250
“ .”
MATH125

Online

Online review mentions tests and but .

Extra credit on tests and quizzes
“All the test and up.”
MATH131

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of . Easy A++!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (1 online, 12 in person), balancing praise and complaints. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Yes there's lots of H.W but it all comes from classwrk.”

⚖️

58/100

“She's a nice professor and she grades on a curve.”

⚠️ Teaching Split

62/100

“One of the .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A++!
  • grades on a curve

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really preps you for tests.
  • Doesn't really help the student when asked
  • She makes sure you understand

Theme 3

⏰ and Workload

  • You won't pass if you don't
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen detailed reviews across multiple math courses show consistent workload themes and a .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1255 reviews
MATH1313 reviews
1311 review
97891 review
MA4501 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH2501 review
STATS501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values