AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

John Segui

CS3A · CS2 · CS002 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if and want a knowledgeable, approachable CS instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProJPL-level CS knowledgeHelpful via emailLabs and project heavySometimes rushed pacingUnclear lab instructions at times
  • Students respect his industry knowledge and willingness to answer questions.
  • , but labs, exams, project, and .
  • Teaching clarity and end-of-term pacing are mixed, so recommendations split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Workload is not heavy and , but , and clarity issues still require steady work.

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Difficulty ratings are low, yet and end-term material rushed.

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; others do not stress strict attendance policing.

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Some highly recommend him for CS knowledge and help; .

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students note credit for attempt, late work accepted without penalty at times, and .

Format shift

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Workload

Light

74/100

Not much homework; , and occasional pop quizzes.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Knowledgeable and helpful, but lectures can be messy or confusing and pacing may rush at the end.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and some pop quizzes or classwork.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence is from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and help, while criticizing , messy writing, and rushed endings.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He doesn't give a and his lectures are good. He's very knowledgeable on computer science.”
CS2
“ and can stray from the book material.”
CS002
“ !”
CS3A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard CS mix of , and occasional pop quizzes with no open-book claims.

MidtermFinal examFinal projectLabsPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, final project, and syllabus-missing pop quizzes.

LabsMidtermFinalFinal projectPop quizzes
“ , and the final project.”
CS002
“Just be prepared for but only count towards classwork.”
CS002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Segui is one of the few professors at pcc that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 In person CS reviews, highlighting knowledge vs clarity tradeoffs. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Not a great teacher though he is very knowledgeable about CS.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ !”

📦

74/100

“He doesn't give a and his lectures are good.”

🧪 Lab Clarity

48/100

“sometimes the , but fortunately he would be lax about it if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • and reachable through e-mails

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • doesn't give a
  • accept late work without penalties
  • Material near the end was very rushed

Theme 3

💼 About Expertise

  • He's very knowledgeable on computer science
  • He works at JPL, therefore his computer science knowledge is undoubted
  • Respected

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews with mixed recommendation tone; detail is useful but sample size and consistency limit confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CS0023 reviews
CS21 review
CS3A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values