AI Rate Professor

English

William Rosenblatt

ENGL400 · ENG1A · ENGL100 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Strong pick for English if you will attend and ; ignore if you need totally flexible attendance.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear Grading CriteriaEncouragingStrict AttendanceImproves WritingLight Homework
  • , and real writing improvement
  • , but and low difficulty keep stress manageable
  • One outlier found lectures repetitive and not useful

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say and show-up focus make failing almost impossible and high grades reachable.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Low difficulty ratings and light homework with .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

while praising outcomes.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Four of five reviews are strongly positive about motivation and writing growth; one is very negative.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and praise-heavy style make grades feel attainable for students who follow directions.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

80/100

as not much; .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students call him a great motivator with ; one felt he only repeated himself.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers and class discussion dominate; little mention of .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and hard to fail if you show up and write.

Main concern

and one review that found lectures repetitive.

What students said

“There is absolutely no way one can fail this class!”
ENG1A
“Strick with attendence , but as along as you are there and paying attention you will do great”
ENGL100
“HW is not much.”
ENGL400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers with .

Paper FocusedClear Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No detailed proctoring or open-book claims; .

Clear Paper CriteriaEssay Focus
“ , and clear articulation of what he wants within each paper presented to him.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is absolutely no way one can fail this class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and attendance strictness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯

80/100

“ , and clear articulation of what he wants within each paper presented to him.”

👍 Encouraging Style

82/100

“Very good motivator. He knows how to praise his students to make them really .”

📅

22/100

“Strick with attendence , but as along as you are there and paying attention you will do great”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor
  • Very good motivator
  • He cares about whether his students are learning

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There is absolutely no way one can fail this class
  • HW is not much
  • This class is kinda relaxing but

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • he doesn't say anything useful
  • he repeats the same thing over and over and over again

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

but limited sample size and one sharp dissent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
09431 review
ENGL1001 review
ENGL4001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1