AI Rate Professor

Portuguese

Nara Cortes

PORT001 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid Nara Cortes; students report and forced paid materials with little support.

Best fit · Budget FirstSubjective GradingForced Online CodeLow Student CareAvoid If Possible
  • Both reviews rate her a 2 and
  • Students accuse her of
  • She forces a if you own the book

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students say strong effort still produced unfairly low grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is rated mid, but grading and required materials dominate the pain more than content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and describe disregard for student effort.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report preparation.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Forced online homework and setup.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say she teaches for a paycheck and ignores effort when she dislikes a student.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Complaints center on papers and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Budget First

In-person PORT001 feels unpaid-for and punitive, with forced online codes and grades students call undeserved.

Main concern

and required paid online access.

What students said

“Very subjective in papers.”
PORT001
“she forces u to buy a online code for hw and online book even u have a 2nd hand one.”
PORT001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If she did not like you, she would just ignore ur effort and gave u a grade that u didnt deserve.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 and forced costs. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

18/100

“Very subjective in papers.”

💸 Forced Materials

25/100

“she forces u to buy a online code for hw and online book even u have a 2nd hand one.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“Teaching for pay checks only & dont care of students.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very subjective in papers.
  • She gave me a grade which was lower than 1 of the D student.

Theme 2

💰 About Cost & Care

  • forces u to buy a online code for hw and online book
  • Teaching for pay checks only & dont care of students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-day negative reviews exist, so but sample size and time span are very limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PORT0012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values