AI Rate Professor

Economics

Lodovico Pizzati

ECON1A · ECONB1 · ECON1B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if and verify his current lecture style; experiences are inconsistent.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Econ ClaritySelf-Study HeavyExams Follow LecturesInconsistent StructureApproachable for Some
  • and unstructured
  • Difficulty is moderate-to-easy but yet misleading
  • and several students prefer self-study from the book

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and one A- appears, but and mixed clarity make grades less automatic.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Average difficulty is low, though harder than the content alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while most do not clearly state the policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is 0 percent and several students call him not recommended or among the .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and mixed but net negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Little detailed grade data; but .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not described as crushing, with short tests and emphasis on .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and helpful while others report no structure and kindergarten-level board work.

Format shift

All teaching comments are in person and polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Short tests that weigh heavily and closely follow class discussion are the main assessment theme.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All six reviews are in person for ECON1A/1B with a and disorganized self-study complaints.

Main concern

and uneven communication quality.

What students said

“Very knowledgable. Learned a lot. Also approachable and very helpful”
ECON1A
“No structure, organization, or .”
ECON1B
“ .”
ECON1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but feel short, high-stakes, and sometimes tricky for others.

Exams follow lecturesShort but heavy-weighted testsSome say tests are misleading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students warn that short tests can weigh heavily and feel misleading.

Lecture-aligned examsShort high-weight tests
“ in class.”
ECON1B
“Short tests but they weigh heavily and meant to be misleading.”
ECON1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Probably the past 2 years at PCC. Self-Study. Definitely not recommended.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized lecture quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“clear and helpful”

📉 Structure Complaints

30/100

“No structure, organization, or .”

📘

40/100

“ .”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

70/100

“Very knowledgable. Learned a lot. Also approachable and very helpful”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgable. Learned a lot
  • No structure, organization, or
  • He spends a lot of time going in depth for one problem

Theme 2

📈 About Exams and Work

  • in class
  • Short tests but they weigh heavily and meant to be misleading
  • The textbook doesn't really help

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • Terrible! Just like the rest of pasadena college's economic professors
  • clear and helpful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews with mixed detail and conflicting opinions limit confidence despite a multi-year span.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON1B3 reviews
ECON1A2 reviews
ECONB11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not_Sure_Yet 2 · Rather not say 1