AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Denise Romero

DA110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle strict punctuality and independent studying for DA110.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict on tardinessThorough PowerPointsInteractive coloringExpects independenceMixed reviews
  • Reviews split between strict, hands-off teaching and thorough, concept-checking lectures.
  • more than three .
  • Success leans on memorization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A solid grade needs punctuality, memorization, and independent work rather than minimal effort.

All evidence is from in-person DA110 reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-low, with content manageable if you memorize and follow PowerPoints.

All evidence is from in-person DA110 reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tardiness .

All evidence is from in-person DA110 reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

One student is lukewarm about strictness; another strongly praises her thorough teaching.

All evidence is from in-person DA110 reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

even when overall grading is not called harsh.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students mention projects and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

thorough interactive lectures versus pressure to learn alone quickly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Projects, memorization, and lecture-based checks appear together without a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person DA110 ranges from strict and self-directed to thorough and interactive, depending on the reviewer.

Main concern

Strict tardiness penalties and expectation that you learn quickly on your own.

What students said

“Very strict on tardyness you cant be more then 3mins late because you will get 3 points off.”
DA110
“Great teacher! Very thorough in and she won't move on until everyone gets the concept.”
DA110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize memorizing terms and policies.

MemorizationProjectsPowerPoint Lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person DA110 leans on memorization, projects, and thorough PowerPoint teaching.

MemorizationProjectsPowerPoint Lectures
“Mostly you have to do a lot of memorizing and studying on your own”
DA110
“ ”
DA110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very strict on tardyness you cant be more then 3mins late because you will get 3 points off.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting strict rules and mixed teaching praise. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Great teacher! Very thorough in and she won't move on until everyone gets the concept.”

⏰

18/100

“Very strict on tardyness you cant be more then 3mins late because you will get 3 points off.”

📚

55/100

“Mostly you have to do a lot of memorizing and studying on your own”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • thorough in
  • interactive coloring while teaching
  • expects you to understand quick and do things on your own

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 3 points off for being more than 3mins late
  • a lot of memorizing and studying on your own

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting in-person reviews years apart limit confidence in any single pattern.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DA1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values